weather icon Clear

What is best not easy question to answer

What does it mean when someone says one solution or another is “the best solution”? It is usually said to suggest that a particular outcome is what everyone should work toward.

Many people do indeed work toward goals that truly benefit others. But it is sometimes said for the particular outcome that is best for the person informing others of what is best for them. And they would like everyone else to work with them on what is most advantageous for them but not necessarily for others.

I attended a seminar recently where the speaker asked if the audience members listened to WII-FM. Most of us reacted with a puzzled look trying to remember if we ever heard of this radio station. After a sufficient pause, the speaker advised the acronym was not for a radio station but stood for “What’s In It For Me?” That question often comes up when trying to determine what is the best solution for each of us as we consider actions to take.

Those two ideas need to be weighed when actions are being taken or recommendations are being made. Who is making the recommendation must be part of the equation to determine if the outcome is truly “the best outcome.” There are many issues that are considered by City Council and asked for by a wide range of individuals here in Boulder City and often from people outside our town.

Members of the City Council must evaluate the proposals being made for what the actual benefits may be and who will be the beneficiaries. The question of “what is the downside” is also a factor.

The coming year for Boulder City will bring many proposals where these questions need to be evaluated. Our city has many great assets that we enjoy. Well-maintained parks, the lowest crime rate in the state, the lowest property tax rates in Southern Nevada and open spaces with great views are among those assets. As various proposals are made, my goal is to determine if the assets we have will be improved or if the “What’s In It For Me” part of the equation has slanted the outcome toward an undesirable result for the community.

The majority of us in this city have a treasured reason why we reside here. Many people have more than one quality they value and do not believe the qualities would be as readily available elsewhere. We are indeed fortunate for the many qualities we have.

But we also must keep in mind that one person’s treasured quality may be seen by others as an undesired quality.

As an example, many people enjoy driving off-road vehicles in the desert. I know I did in my younger days. A question was placed on the ballot last year to allow a certain type of these vehicles to be driven on Boulder City streets. This would be limited to the type of the vehicles authorized by the state but left up to each community to decide. A majority of residents voted against allowing the vehicles. The vote against allowing the vehicles was about 60%. Some people on both sides of the issue had strong opinions about what was best. People saw the question of what was in it for them differently from one another.

These types of questions are common for local governments to address and the best outcomes are often difficult to determine. In this newspaper last week was a story about some leases at the airport set to expire later this year. The leases have allowed some longtime residents to enjoy their avocation for flying for many years. The leases provided for very low rates with the understanding that hangars would be built at their expense and then given to the city after 30 years.

These types of questions are not easy to answer and often involve deeply held beliefs of what the best outcome will be. The challenge for me and the other members of the City Council is to try to arrive at what is best for the community. I know that is what will be the determining factor for me.

Kiernan McManus is mayor of Boulder City. He is a native of Boulder City first elected to City Council in 2017.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
Give thanks for all we have

Because the Boulder City Review publishes on Thursdays, I get the honor of wishing all of our readers a “Happy Thanksgiving” each year — and this year is no exception.

Much can be done in an hour

Have you ever figured out just what an hour a day represents? How often have you wanted to do something but said, “I didn’t have the time”?

Consider alternative ideas for lawn’s replacement

History is the story we want to pass on to future generations, hopefully somewhere they can find it. How we tell the story for future generations is the responsibility of the present generation.

City true winner from elections

After months of campaigning, the 2022 election is complete. Ballots have been counted and congratulations are in order for those who were elected.

Low-cost grocery store needed

One of the hot topics I’m hearing discussed in town is whether or not Boulder City needs a second grocery store. There is a question on the ballot this month (by the time this piece is published, the votes will have already been cast) regarding whether or not to allocate land at the corner of Veterans Memorial Drive and Boulder City Parkway for a shopping center that would include space for a new grocery store.

Pelletier’s dedication was blessing for city

After five years of service to Boulder City, Finance Director Diane Pelletier is retiring. I was mayor in 2018 when Interim City Manager Scott Hanson hired Diane. She came to us after 18 years of distinguished service for the Atlanta Regional Commission and 12 more for the Orange Water and Sewer Authority in North Carolina. We thought she was a major steal at the time. And she’s proved us right in every respect.

Media is the mess-age

My entire, mostly monolithic career was spent as a commercial broadcast professional. Knowing at an early age broadcast would be my chosen field, I took requisite communications studies preparatory to entering the business.

Land sale for grocer not in city’s best interest

Boulder City voters will have a chance to weigh in on whether or not the city should sell 16.3 acres of land for the development of a shopping center, primarily a grocery store. From a resident’s standpoint, a second grocery store would be nice, competition is often good and choice can benefit the consumer.

Preservation ordinance remains controversial

Last week, after years of discussion and planning, the City Council passed a new historic preservation ordinance.