weather icon Clear

Terms of airport leases cannot be ignored

Thank you Roger Gros. I read with respect your article in the Boulder City Review, dated June 10. Being from an aviation family myself, I appreciate your opinions on the airport leases. Unfortunately, you ignored the primary facts of the disagreement, which are the leases, in order to make impassioned arguments on why the city should not enforce its rights under the expiring leases at Boulder City Municipal Airport. If you had included the contractual terms of the leases in your article, none of the arguments you subsequently made would have any meaning.

Citizens decided to fund the building of the airport and adjoining land, for the betterment of the entire community. Since no private money was available for such a large and long undertaking, taxpayer dollars (the government), shouldered these expenses. As an inducement to attract businesses necessary for the operation of an airport, the taxpayers agreed to subsidize leases at well below market rents for 30 years. This would allow small businesses to open up with much less hard capital than is normally needed. Jobs were created, capital improvements added and capital expenditures were undertaken for aircraft and facilities.

This is a very common commercial real estate technique throughout American capitalism. The businesses open up with less capital, at extremely low rent, are able to build their business, and turn a profit, for perhaps decades. The lenders (landlords) take a below rate of return for decades, but get the property back after a specified period of time, including all property improvements made by the tenants.

Chain restaurants use this technique all the time. Low capital, great profits and, when the lease terminates, the owner gets the land and the improvements to offset the lower rate of return on the ground lease for all those years. The tenant makes enough money to offset the cost of improvements and even gets to write it off against taxes owed.

These win/win incentives are called ground leases with reversion, and are common throughout the 19,000 general aviation airports in the U.S. This is the type of lease we have here at our airport. Further, the Federal Aviation Administration demands, in writing, the city take back the property at the end of the lease.

Imagine, Mr. Gros, if you held the landlord’s position. You would most certainly enforce the termination of the lease and be fending off articles like the one you just cleverly wrote.

The leases were signed by all parties, without duress, and included a clause calling for quitclaims back to the landlord (city) to avoid any future confusion. But now, a list of arguments, not pertinent to the terms of the lease, are being bandied about.

They all have a commonality as follows:

1. Ignore the law and the lease.

2. Reject paying back the landlord (taxpayer) with reversion (the improvements) even though previously agreed in writing.

3. Insistence that despite using taxpayer money to ensure profit, profit should go to private business or individuals, and not to the city for the future improvement of the airport facility.

4. Politicizing the disagreement, as if it were a liberal or conservative issue, when it is simply a very common business issue, with a clear, enforceable contract.

There is an existing valid lease coming to termination, but now one side simply doesn’t like the terms they agreed to and operated under for over 30 years. They want to bite the hand that feeds them, stiff the taxpayers, and disregard the law.

It’s really quite that simple. We will probably see lawsuits with no merit, eating up taxpayer and private citizen funds alike. But please read the publicly available lease. It will become apparent it is fair, enforceable and not the least bit ambiguous.

Please support our City Council and all taxpayers in receiving their fair, agreed upon return on this lease, for the future benefit of our airport, with our continued support of small businesses throughout our community, and oppose those that advocate the rejection of law, order and legal written contracts, while promoting self-aggrandizement.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
Celebrate our freedom

Saturday is our nation’s 244th birthday, and that’s something worth celebrating.

Pandemic calls for citizens to care for, about each other

For this column I looked back on the columns I have written over the past few months. At the beginning of March my column focused on the rollout of the new marketing campaign for Las Vegas and how it would benefit our city, as well. What followed within two weeks changed our lives in ways that have brought hardships to many of us.

Kindness, compassion still exist

It seems these days that hate and anger are everywhere. You can’t pick up a newspaper, watch television news or even scan social media without reading about or seeing something bad.

Nation watches ‘good, bad, ugly’

We all have witnessed the extraordinary in the human race with the recent launch of the SpaceX rocket and space vehicle “Crew Dragon.” It was a joint effort led by a private team of scientists, engineers and technicians, along with NASA and its team of experts. It was an unbelievable venture and a first for a private enterprise to accomplish.

Education must be applied to be helpful

As I’ve watched, via my computer, the unfolding of events since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, I’ve tried to stay focused on what I, one person among 7.8 billion worldwide can possibly do to make our lives better.

We should be united as nation

I was there with Martin Luther King Jr. working for civil rights. I was there with a black preacher working for equal rights. I was there in tears and held the hand of a black friend tell of the way he was treated as a young man in south Georgia. I was there when the Civil Rights Act of 1964 legally ended discrimination. I was there and observed the people of our nation wanted change and the end of discrimination. Discrimination and injustice still exist and always will, but I was there and have seen amazing progress in race relations.

Violence, riots will not stop president’s re-election

No conspiracies this month, folks, merely a string of coincidences with the same mission: to avenge the 2016 presidential election and prevent President Donald Trump’s re-election.

Targeting of journalists by police must end

There is no longer any question that law enforcement agents are deliberately targeting journalists covering the George Floyd protests. There are now dozens of examples clearly showing police in cities throughout the U.S. aiming at, shooting, tear-gassing, pushing, hitting, shoving and arresting reporters who have clearly identified themselves as working journalists.

Mayor needs to tell whole story

We’ve beginning to see a pattern with our new mayor and City Council. And it’s quite disturbing to those of us who wanted transparency and honesty from our newly elected officials.

Spaced out adventures await

I may have been physically confined to my home for the past couple of months as the state, nation and world have fought against the deadly coronavirus, but that hasn’t stopped me from taking an out-of-this-world adventure.