60°F
weather icon Partly Cloudy

Prioritize spending for public projects

How would you react if a store stocked merchandise few customers were interested in buying and those few customers who did buy were unwilling to pay the fully burdened price? Would you, a nonpurchaser, willingly subsidize stocking and distribution costs?

The recent perspective about a control tower for our local airport spawned a larger issue. It is so easy to spend other people’s involuntarily contributed money (taxes and fees) when there are few personal consequences and no real metrics to establish whether tangible value and benefits have been widely received. A few vocal groups advocate for such spending that fails to benefit the community at large. Of course, the advocates don’t want to pay for 100 percent of their discretionary activities and recreation, preferring to pass most of the cost on to nonusers who will receive little benefit.

We have many worrying examples in Boulder City of just such contorted logic and thinking that disrespects our many elderly and limited-income residents who must carefully budget and spend their money to survive in an inflationary world.

Our local airport is officially designated as an enterprise fund, the same as the city’s utility system. This designation means that whatever needs beyond federal funding these functions have, they are to pay from their revenue without tapping other city funds. Yet, the airport wants $1,596,438 of city money for the next five years of capital projects, primarily not generated from operations. Why should the relatively few users of the airport among Boulder City’s 16,000 residents be expected to contribute financially? Airport management’s duty centers on funding and running the airport without local taxpayers subsidizing its operations or mimicking McCarran (International Airport in Las Vegas).

It is no different at our two municipal golf courses. A small fraction of residents actually play these courses, even including sporadic users. The fees users pay are inadequate to cover subsidized water, maintenance and general golf course operations. The bulk of residents are involuntarily subsidizing discretionary recreation for the benefit of a relative few.

How can anyone argue that this situation is just, equitable and reasonable? If golf course operations can’t be self-sufficient, shouldn’t we be researching other alternatives, including a potential sale to a private operator with restrictive deed covenants that the courses could not be converted to other land uses?

The municipal swimming pool’s major renovation or complete demolition and reconstruction will soon be before us again. You will remember that voters rightly turned down the $45 million boondoggle proposed by the 2018-2019 City Council, despite the one-sided information campaign presented by that council’s majority, the former city manager and former city attorney.

The current pool financing scheme proposed by the city’s finance director takes money from multiple sources that could be used to repair our crumbling streets or fund overdue city building and asset repairs/replacements spanning many decades, and that would favorably impact most Boulderites.

Given the expansive features specified by the ad hoc pool committee, don’t be surprised if the proposed project costs come in at $20 million to $35 million. That’s a powerful amount of money for a 16,000-person community and 1,500 pool admissions a month. Most Boulderites don’t use the current pool and haven’t over its four-decade lifetime repeatedly marred by ignored interim maintenance and massive deterioration.

The most disappointing aspect of the public pool deliberations is that alternatives exist which have been intentionally ignored because a few swimmers prefer only three choices: 1. Keep the existing pool running on some basis into the indefinite future despite its expensive operating costs; 2. Reconstruct the existing pool, which requires compliance with a long list of new health and safety standards; and, 3. Start anew with an expansive pool/recreation complex.

What are the unexplored alternatives? For starters, Henderson has three competition-level swimming complexes. Boulder City Parks and Recreation could explore a joint venture where we offer scheduled transportation (Silver Rider-style) and reduced price or free admission to our city residents, including high school swimmers. We have Lake Mead. We also have over 900 private swimming pools in every neighborhood of our city. How about swimmers working out a private arrangement with their friends or neighbors who have pools?

Finally, we have our one-branch library system that charges us as much as a 266 percent higher property tax rate than the other three library districts in Clark County. Our county commission-appointed library trustees have been exceedingly hesitant to research merely the possibility of joining our library with one of the other systems, even though there are economies of scale in operations, purchasing and administration to be potentially realized. Why the fear of facts and analysis?

All of the examples cited above support this piece’s underlying premise. Why are people who have a responsibility to carefully spend other people’s money proceeding in such a reckless and carefree fashion? Only public attention and fact telling will change these regressive dynamics harming the general population.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
Get to know candidates before casting vote

Election Day for our local primary election will be April 6. Voting for this election will again have a mail-in ballot sent to every registered voter in Boulder City. Early voting in person will also be available. The early voting this year will be in the city recreation center next to City Hall for easier access.

In-person communication crucial to democracy

What is happening to Boulder City as well as America has parallels. Having been a member of City Council as well as the mayor for 12 years, I have some insights to offer.

Is mask mandate realistic?

We’ve all heard the term “Where’s the beef?” The new 2021 term should be “Where’s the data?” That’s right, the data. Many, espousing to be our leaders, have continually warned us about the steps required to stay healthy while navigating this pandemic. Mandates soon followed the warnings.

Truth will help reveal solutions to nation’s woes

How do you stay calm and limit your stress every day? Personally, I take lots of deep breaths, stop whatever I’m doing and focus on something else. I push what’s bothering me to another part of my brain and move on. It’s rough, but I’ve had practice over the years, and it works most of the time.

City clerk vital to election, transparency

Mayor (Kiernan) McManus is on a mission to destroy our city. He has scheduled an agenda item at the Feb. 23 City Council meeting to terminate City Clerk Lorene Krumm’s employment contract.

Historical ignorance ruining America

While stationed in West Germany in 1978, I visited Dachau, the site of a former Nazi concentration camp. My bride is of Jewish ancestry and chose not to accompany me. I am glad she stayed home. No history book or teacher can prepare you for such an experience. Suffice to say, the stench and ambience of death still lingered and are forever etched in my memory.

Look for the good

Last week I wrote about our nation having hope and needing healing. Based on comments I received on social media and email, I can see we have a long way to go — a very long way.

City makes progress vaccinating residents

I have heard the suggestion that we should give January of 2021 back to 2020 and start 2021 in this month of February as January presented so many of the same challenges we have had to confront. February does in fact hold promise for beginning the process of recovery from all the hardships and stress the COVID-19 pandemic has inflicted on us.

Hope returns to our nation

Last Wednesday morning I watched the inauguration of our nation’s 46th president, Joseph R. Biden, with tears in my eyes.

Censorship of legitimate opinions not acceptable

I have enjoyed the time spent writing a monthly commentary column for our local newspaper, the Boulder City Review. The commentary I put to pen is, of course, my opinion — an opinion that I have found to be held by numerous readers, not all, but many. Of course, there are those who do not share my position on the subject matter that I present and that is certainly well understood and acceptable.