56°F
weather icon Clear

Tiny homes: Vote brings city into compliance

Call it a case of just because something has been approved does not mean it will actually happen.

In their Aug. 8, 2023 meeting, the city council voted unanimously to amend existing zoning to allow for tiny homes as an allowed use within areas of the city already designated for use as mobile home parks and mobile home estates.

The change brings Boulder City into compliance with state law. In 2021, the Nevada State Legislature passed SB150, which mandated that municipalities in the state have to adjust their zoning ordinances to allow for tiny homes no later than Jan. 1 of 2024.

While members of the public expressed fears based on popular television shows that had seen things like shipping containers and old school buses converted into living quarters and expressed an opinion that such dwellings would not be “in character” for Boulder City, city Development Director Michael Mays explained that such fears were unfounded in this case.

“A tiny home is defined as a residential dwelling that is 400 square feet or smaller excluding lofts.” Later he clarified that, using the example of the school bus, “Anything that would be affixed with wheels would be considered a vehicle and that would be considered an RV.”

The key bit of info came under questioning from Councilmember Steve Walton, who asked if, regardless of the zoning allowing for tiny homes if owners of mobile home parks could disallow them on their property or if a homeowners’ association representing tract owners in a mobile home estate might disallow tiny homes in their covenants, conditions and restrictions (commonly known as CC&Rs).

The answer that came back was, yes. The fact that zoning allows for such homes does not mean private property owners are bound to allow such usage. All the zoning change does is bring Boulder City into technical compliance with this new state law. The only requirement of SB150 other than that tiny homes have to be allowed in zoning was that a city or county “must consider whether the locations of tiny houses in the designated zoning districts will have disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental effects on minority populations and low-income populations.”

The city anticipates no such adverse effects as tiny home would be treated, for zoning purposes, exactly the same as mobile homes.

In other action, the council voted to change the zoning of 783 acres in the Eldorado Valley from government open land space to energy resources.This plot is adjacent to land to the north and to the east, which is already zoned for energy resources and will likely be used for additional future solar development.

MOST READ
THE LATEST
Doc loses license for 5 years

A Boulder City chiropractor has lost his license to practice in the state for five years, which could be extended if he does not adhere to requirements voted upon by the Chiropractic Physicians’ Board of Nevada.

Dog park slated to reopen Oct. 31

Before the mayor cut the ribbon on a city-funded dog park with grass inside Veterans’ Memorial Park in August of last year, Boulder City was the only municipality in the region not to have such a facility. (See Spot Run is just a stone’s throw away but it is privately run and does not have grass.)

An educational leap of faith

Something new recently opened in Boulder City, which brought with it a bit of a twist to traditional education.

Animal Control loses its leader

A number of issues involving pets in Boulder City has been changing at lightning speed over the past several days, culminating in an announcement via social media channels on Tuesday that Animal Control Supervisor Ann Inabnitt will be retiring, effective Dec. 31.

Hundreds expected at pancake breakfast

Regardless of if you prefer to call them pancakes, flapjacks, hotcakes or griddle cakes, they always bring a smile to one’s face.

Church seeks new housing project plan

As the old saying goes, if at first you don’t succeed, try, try again.

A battle over airport business impact

Before the city council voted unanimously to accept a Business Impact Study regarding increasing some fees at the city-owned airport, the lone speaker in public comment — who chose not to identify himself but has spoken multiple times in the past year on issues surrounding the operation of the airport — had one thing on his mind. Fuel costs.