83°F
weather icon Clear

Council OKs controverial zone change

Funeral homes and mortuaries are now allowed as a conditional use in the city’s C1 neighborhood commercial zone despite a divided vote by City Council and numerous residents voicing their opposition to the idea.

At Tuesday’s council meeting, more than 50 people provided comment, mostly opposing a text amendment to allow funeral homes and mortuaries in R1 single-family residential and C1 neighborhood commercial zones. Currently, they are allowed as a conditional use in C2 general commercial and CM commercial manufacturing zones.

Tyson Smith, owner of Boulder City Family Mortuary, applied for the change.

“All we’re trying to do is make it so we have more options out there,” he said.

Smith said his Boulder City and Henderson locations are at capacity and, if a property like a church, became available, he would like to be able to move forward with it.

Lost value, traffic

Those who were not in favor of the change expressed concern about their property losing value and the increased traffic a funeral home or mortuary could bring to a neighborhood.

“It would be irresponsible to not consider this impact on residents. … I respectfully submit that such a proposed business as a mortuary should be located in a pure commercial zone, and not be shoe-horned into a residential zone where many residents and citizens of Boulder City will be forced to take a significant financial hit,” wrote Jeff Johnson in his emailed comment.

Resident Bruce Smith said the “overall thing” with the amendment is “money” and his property value is going to go down if it’s passed.

“I’m going to lose value in my house for something I don’t want,” he said.

They also expressed concern about the possibility of a crematorium eventually being put in at the mortuary.

Smith said that “fear should be put to rest” because his crematorium is in Henderson and he isn’t planning on putting one in Boulder City.

“It’s not permitted,” he said. “The process to put one in (a) town is a nightmare.”

Necessary business

“It’s just a challenge to find anything that would be suitable,” Smith added. “What we do need is a chapel that would seat up to 125 people and we need offices inside of the funeral home. I’m looking for possibly three offices, four offices, (and) a couple of arrangement rooms to sit with families and make arrangements.”

Those who supported the amendment said they wanted to make sure Smith could keep his business in town.

“Funeral homes are supposed to be a part of the community, not on the outside,” Allen Calvert wrote in an email. “As anyone that would be interested in moving a funeral home into the area would still need to get approval even with the zoning amendment, I see no reason why this change is not appropriate as everything still has to be approved on a case by case basis.”

Others simply encouraged the council to do what was best for the community.

“I fully recognize the weight that’s on your shoulders as City Council, and I recognize that the decisions that you make, the policies that you set will define this community for generations to come. … I pray that you reflect and make the decision that is in the best interest of our community,” said Stephen Gay.

Zoning conditions

Councilman James Howard Adams asked Smith what about the C2 zone didn’t work for a mortuary.

Smith said the “spacing is too tight” and there is no building large enough with enough parking.

“It’s not about me,” he said. “It’s about the community … I love our community. I love my neighbors right here. … I promise if I was in someone’s backyard, I would be the best neighbor I could be.”

Since they are a conditional use, Smith, or anyone else, would have to go before the Planning Commission for approval to open a mortuary at a specific property.

During their discussion, the council members agreed they had to look at this request objectively and not personally.

“I do understand the need for a mortuary. … This is not about a specific business owner,” said Mayor Kiernan McManus. “It is the type of businesses that are to be allowed to operate in residential areas.”

“We have to look at it … objectively,” said Councilwoman Sherri Jorgensen. “Not as a person applying. Not as a place, but as what is being asked because what is being asked tonight is for a change in the R1 and C1 to include as a conditional use mortuaries.”

Jorgensen also said she believes mortuaries are an essential business.

“The thing that I know more than anything is, as sure as we are born, we will die, and that’s a fact,” she said. “And as we need people to be there for us when we are born to help us in that process, we need people to be there for us when we die.”

Limited opportunities

Jorgensen also said she wasn’t comfortable with mortuaries being allowed in the R1 zone, but she did think it could work in the C1 zone because they would have less of an impact than some of the currently permitted uses in that zone like grocery stores.

Councilman Matt Fox agreed and said it’s hard to find the right location in town for a business because there isn’t much available. He also said he’d be OK with a mortuary in the C1 zone.

Both McManus and Adams said they did not agree with the amendment because of the amount of public opposition to it.

“They have stated their fears and concerns over the financial impact it might have on their property values,” said Adams. “There are concerns about the quality of life they have come to expect in Boulder City.”

McManus said he thought this amendment did not promote the general welfare of the city because of the opposition to it and that it didn’t comport with the city’s comprehensive plan.

Jorgensen made the motion to approve the amendment but only allow mortuaries in the C1 zone. Council approved it in a 3-2 vote with McManus and Adams voting against it.

Contact reporter Celia Shortt Goodyear at cgoodyear@bouldercityreview.com or at 702-586-9401. Follow her on Twitter @csgoodyear.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
Mother Nature lends a ‘foot;’ lake’s level rises

The wettest Las Vegas Valley monsoon season in a decade likely isn’t the only reason behind it, but Lake Mead has risen just over 18 inches during recent area rainfall.

EPA head joins Lee, Horsford to discuss drought

Nevada Reps. Susie Lee and Steven Horsford welcomed the United States Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Michael S. Regan to Lake Mead on Aug. 11 to discuss the ongoing drought.

More skeletal remains discovered at Lake Mead

Another set of human skeletal remains have been found at Lake Mead National Recreation Area. The remains were found at Swim Beach at 8 p.m. Monday, Aug. 15.

Schools report smooth return

Parents can finally exhale after a long summer of kids in the house as school is back in session in Boulder City. On Monday, Aug. 8, all four schools in town welcomed back students for the 2022-23 school year in an orderly fashion without any mishaps.

Council OKs plan to remove turf

Water was once again the main focus for City Council. At its meeting Tuesday, Aug. 9, an agreement with the Southern Nevada Water Association that will remove turf in Boulder City to save on water was approved 4-0 by the council.

Council gets first look at Nevada Way remodel

The Boulder City Council was introduced to a project that will remodel and rehabilitate the stretch of Nevada Way from Wyoming to Park streets during its meeting Tuesday, Aug. 9.

More human remains found at Lake Mead

More human remains have been found at Lake Mead, according to officials at the national recreation area.

Fire department targets sites to improve response times

Two locations are being targeted for a new Boulder City Fire substation that the City Council approved last month to help the department improve response time to emergencies. The proposed new fire station, labeled Station 122, is looking at sites at Quartzite Road and Nevada Way as well as near the library at 701 Adams Boulevard. The city owns land in both locations.

Ex-manager sues city; claims retaliation

Former City Manager Al Noyola filed a lawsuit against the city Friday, July 29, alleging that his civil rights were violated when he was fired Oct. 13, 2020.