weather icon Partly Cloudy

Council keeping $40 million question

Updated February 28, 2019 - 9:45 am

Boulder City is still moving forward with a ballot question seeking voter approval for issuing up to $40 million in bonds for a new aquatic center despite one council member’s desire for the question to be repealed.

In January, the City Council approved two ballot questions for the June 11 election about financing a new aquatic center.

One question asks voters whether the city should be authorized to issue up to $40 million of general obligation bonds for the project. The second asks whether the city should use $5 million from the capital improvement fund, as it becomes available, to reduce its bond obligation.

At the Tuesday, Feb. 26, meeting, Councilman Warren Harhay requested the $40 million question be removed from the ballot because he said he was concerned officials were taking the wrong direction with the project.

He said he felt the decision was rushed because the council members found out at the Jan. 8 meeting that they had to vote on the bond question that night.

“I think that is an inappropriate way to consider a large project like this,” he said. “I don’t like to make decisions under the gun of a time limit. … From my experience, rush decisions never turn out well.”

The proposed aquatic center includes a program pool and a competition pool, a fitness center, locker rooms, racquetball courts, a meeting room and an outdoor family pool.

Harhay also said they don’t have hard facts on the price. The new aquatic center is estimated to cost approximately $30 million now, but city officials asked for $40 million to allow for inflation and contingencies. He said he thought there were other funding options available than bonds and would like those to be researched.

“I believe there are other funding options out there,” he said.

Harhay made a motion to approve repealing it but could not get a second.

Councilman Rich Shuman said that the City Council needs to move forward because the question was already approved.

“Once you pass something, it gets moving. … It gets going,” he said. “Departments start working on it. … To pull it back once the wheels have been rolling doesn’t seem right. No matter what the question is.”

“I think at issue here is the price tag,” Councilman Kiernan McManus said.

But he said they should go ahead with the question and see what the public wants to do.

Mayor Rod Woodbury also said he thought the public should have a chance to weigh in on the bond question.

“All we can do is put it out there and see what they want to do. … There is an appetite from the community to weigh in on this,” he said.

Councilwoman Peggy Leavitt said the public had weighed on what it wanted during the process, and she said she the new facility would bring the community together.

Members of the public also expressed support in moving forward with the ballot question.

Wendi Lauer said she thought the voters should weigh in.

“I think if we waffle on this too much, people are going to lose faith in the system,” she said.

Alan Goya said he probably would not use the pool because his children are older, but he wanted the other children in town to be able to use the pool before leaving to go to college.

A breakdown of the costs for the new aquatic center is available at www.bcnv.org/documentcenter/view/5297/aquatic-center-cost-breakdown_27m.

Also at Tuesday’s meeting, the council did the following:

*Approved, in a 4-1 vote, a resolution committing to secure and exhaust other funding sources to finance the new aquatic center before relying upon the tax base.

McManus did not vote for the resolution because he had problems with how the costs came forward: The architects came in at $21 million for the new pool, but, without their input, the city said it would be $37 million.

“I can’t support it,” he said about the resolution.

Contact reporter Celia Shortt Goodyear at cgoodyear@bouldercityreview.com or at 702-586-9401. Follow her on Twitter @csgoodyear.

Former fire chief Gray discusses termination

The past few weeks have been a whirlwind for the city, and specifically the fire department, as questions of whether or not Will Gray was still employed as that department’s chief spread through town.

Breeding proposal breeds opposition

Judging by the number of people speaking out against it during public comment at the last city council meeting and the tone of numerous social media posts, the proposal to allow for licensed pet breeders to operate in Boulder City is itself breeding a growing opposition. And the opposition appears to be spilling over into other pet-centric issues, including the fact that, unlike anywhere else in Clark County, Boulder City does not require dogs to be on a leash in public.

Wanted: A good home for theater seats

For those who have either grown up in Boulder City or are longtime residents, the Boulder City Theatre holds a special place in the hearts of many.

Hangars and OHVs and pool people, oh my

In a meeting with only two council members present in the room (and the other three on the phone) and in which the major attention was divided between a contentious possible law concerning pets and the fact that the city manager had announced he was leaving for a new job on the East Coast, the council did take a series of other notable actions.

Look, up in the sky…

Ron Eland/Boulder City Review

Council hears plan for golf course turf reduction

Reducing water usage in Southern Nevada has been a subject that has affected the look of clean, green Boulder City multiple times in the past year.

City confirms fire chief no longer employed

After more than two weeks of inquiries by the Boulder City Review, late Tuesday afternoon the city confirmed that Boulder City Fire Chief Will Gray is no longer employed.

Residents weigh in on 99 Cents Store’s shuttering

In what came as a surprise to many who are frequent shoppers, officials from 99 Cents Only Stores announced last week that all of their 371 locations will be closing over the next several weeks.

Four suspects arrested in graffiti case

On Jan. 22, many residents were shocked by a rash of graffiti throughout town, which included the historic Boulder City Theatre.