99°F
weather icon Windy

City asks judge to reconsider fuel tankers’ use

The city attorney is asking a district court judge to reconsider a motion allowing a Boulder City Municipal Airport operator to use tractor-trailers to dispense fuel.

On March 31, City Attorney Steve Morris filed the motion in Nevada’s Eighth District Court asking Judge Timothy C. Williams to reconsider his approval of a preliminary injunction allowing BFE LLC to dispense fuel from two 10,000-gallon mobile refueling trailers while the company’s complaint against the city is decided.

In his motion, Morris wrote that he was asking Williams to reconsider because “BFE’s unpermitted use of the tanker poses a substantial risk for public safety based on their proximity to public use buildings, multiple fuel and passenger-laden aircraft, and location on terrain which slopes toward those areas.”

He also wrote that Williams’ order “inappropriately overrides the Fire Chief’s authority, judgment and duty to protect the public from such hazards under Nevada law.”

Additionally, Morris wrote that a “significantly greater fire-fighting capacity” is needed to deal with this type of trailer that is used at other airports for larger planes.

“The City simply does not have this capability and must therefore restrict the amount of fuel in approved mobile delivery trucks at the airport,” he wrote.

Robert Fahnestock, owner of BFE, filed a complaint against the city and the Boulder City Fire Department in November after he was told he could not use the mobile trailers he had purchased to conduct fueling activities allowed under his lease.

He was told they violated the 2012 International Fire Code, airport rules and minimum standards, and his lease, which allows only underground fuel storage tanks.

In his March 13 order, Williams wrote that Section 5704.2.3 of the fire code defines tank storage as “the storage of flammable and combustible liquids in portable tanks whose capacity exceeds 660 gallons” and makes “no distinction between a 2,500 gallon and a 8,500 gallon or other mobile fuel tenders.”

“Hypothetically, all mobile tenders in use at the Boulder City Airport would violate the IFC because … they all have a capacity exceeding 660 gallons; and … they all are used to perform both refueling and storage functions,” he wrote.

Additionally, Williams described the city’s enforcement of fuel storage methods as “arbitrary and capricious.”

A hearing for Boulder City’s motion to reconsider is scheduled for 9:30 a.m. today, April 9.

Contact reporter Celia Shortt Goodyear at cgoodyear@bouldercityreview.com or at 702-586-9401. Follow her on Twitter @csgoodyear.

MOST READ
LISTEN TO THE TOP FIVE HERE
THE LATEST
Council confusion: The leash law saga continues

Three statements — notably, none of them from members of the city council — best illustrated the difficulties residents (both dog-loving and not) have had for at least four years when it comes to the issue of off-leash dogs in public parks.

Breeding in BC? Probably not

Unlike the discussion later in the meeting Tuesday night in which the city council appeared determined to make sure no one was angry at them about the issue of off-leash dogs, they directed staff to take very strong action on the issue of pet breeding.

Lifejacket donations aim to save lives

Greg Bell’s memory lives on by way of a generous donation that may saves lives.

Huge crowd turns out to honor Patton

It was brought up during Saturday’s unveiling of the Shane Patton Memorial Monument as to why Shane’s statue stands 11 feet tall.

Disaster in China affects Damboree fireworks show

As the city prepares for Damboree, one of our biggest celebrations of the year, a tragedy in China is having an impact on the annual fireworks show.

City Celebrates First Responders

Photos courtesy City of Boulder City

Toll Brothers gets split decision

The development of the area near Boulder Creek Golf Course known as Tract 350 (the sale of which is slated to pay for the majority of the planned replacement for the aging municipal pool) may have hit a snag last week as the planning commission voted 5-1 to deny the developers’ request to build houses closer to the street than is allowed under current law.