76°F
weather icon Clear

Gambling vs. gaming

Last week the Columbia Journalism Review, a publication that polices journalism practices and policies, ran an article about the use of the terms “gambling” and “gaming” to describe gambling. The Review managed never to take a position on the dispute. In fact, the article appeared to have been written off the top of the author’s head after a trip to Las Vegas with little research.

In fact, among other things, writer Merrill Perlman seems to think the casino industry’s efforts to get people to use the term “gaming” is something new: “The casino industry in recent years has tried to get people to call what they do at casinos ‘gaming.’ ”

Perlman points at an online essay posted by the American Gaming Association, a lobby group until recently headed by former Nevada Republican Party Chairman Frank Fahrenkopf. The lobbyists have this to say, in part: “While some people assume the word ‘gaming’ was created as a way to ‘re-invent’ the casino industry, history tells a different story. The word ‘gaming’—defined as the action or habit of playing at games of chance for stakes—actually dates back to 1510, predating use of the word ‘gambling’ by 265 years.”

Of course, the rap on “gaming” is not that it is used to reinvent the industry but that it is used to soften the risks and consequences of gambling. That’s a straw man. As for that fact (if it is one) that “gaming” came before “gambling,” so what? “Drawing lots” came still earlier (Numbers 26:55-56, Joshua 14-21, Matthew 27:35). Does that mean we should use it? Longevity is not the issue.

The real issue is an ethical one. Should we, as reporters, take sides in policy issues by using language preferred by one side? It’s akin to the way reporters acted in Las Vegas in July 2002 when doctors went on strike at a trauma center to protest being held responsible for malpractice. Reporters took sides, supporting doctors and failing to give lawyers their fair say. One of the ways reporters took sides was by avoiding the term “strike,” instead looking for all kinds of euphemisms – “stoppage,” “protest,” “closure,” “closed its doors,” “shut its doors,” “refused to return,” “took themselves off their normal rotations.” I saw one story that used the term strike — in the 12th paragraph. The consequences of slanted coverage were substantial — a special session of the Legislature where doctors prevailed over lawyers.

Gambling is still a contentious policy issue in our society, even more so as technology introduces new ways of gambling that are faster, more tempting, and more likely to lead to addiction. “This is the crack cocaine of gambling,” said therapist Michael Boston of St. Mary’s Hospital in Reno in 1992, describing video poker.

At least we know why the gambling industry prefers the euphemism — it wants to lure people into gambling and it wants to manipulate reporters into helping. What we don’t know is the motive of some reporters for going along.

Even if ethics were not involved, precision is. The term “gaming” is vague and undiscriminating. It refers to everything from parcheesi for fun to church bingo for prizes to casino blackjack for money to video games to office politics. Gambling is precise. It’s wagering for money. What good reporter would intentionally opt for ambiguity?

“Language can be used to mislead and confuse, or to make certain ideas seem more profound than they really are,” writes critical thinking instructor Jonathan Chan of Saylor.org. “One main task of critical thinking is to identify these linguistic pitfalls.

Let us start with the first major pitfall — obscurity. ‘Obscurity’ here refers to unclear meaning. A concept or a linguistic expression can be unclear for various reasons. One reason is that it might be ambiguous, i.e. having more than one meaning. The other reason is that it might be vague. A term is said to be vague if there are borderline cases where it is indeterminate as to whether it applies or not.

Finally, a term might also have an unclear meaning in that its meaning is incomplete

Is that really the standard to which journalism should aspire?

To be sure, most journalism style requirements — including those of The Associated Press and The New York Times — call for use of “gambling.” But when commerce and journalism clash, journalism doesn’t always win, as Nevada readers know.

MOST READ
THE LATEST
Power of people remains at polls

This Sunday is the first anniversary of the Women’s March. Don’t fret, I’m not writing a commercial. I’m looking at a very abbreviated history of individuals coming together to make a statement.

Potential for adventure in city gets real

Reality TV and Boulder City are starting to become a common thing. Recently, the HGTV show “Flip or Flop Vegas” filmed in our quaint town, with an episode promised to air this upcoming summer. However, the likes of Tommy Lee (Mötley Crüe) and Gear Duran aka Gear Boxxx (“Skin Wars”) have had Boulder City ties for sometime now.

Finding right school for child’s needs key to success

Later this month, schools, homeschool groups, organizations and individuals in Nevada and across America will work together to raise awareness about the importance of opportunity in K-12 education.

Mayor should consider re-election

Who will run for mayor in 2019? I realize that we are over a year away from people even putting their names in the hat. Yet, if they are serious about running, they need to start thinking now.

Awards for revitalization efforts, faith in city well-deserved

At our final 2017 City Council meeting, I had the privilege of presenting two Mayor’s Awards, one to All Mountain Cyclery and the other to The Tap, for their 2017 business corridor revitalization efforts. These two businesses weren’t the only ones that worked to spruce up our commercial sector, but the scale of their projects and their commitment to reinvest in our community really stood out to me.

Eastwood accepts ‘Gauntlet,’ runs with it

Actor, producer and writer Clint Eastwood came through Boulder City for a 1977 film titled “The Gauntlet.” While Eastwood was always on board to direct the Warner Bros. picture, he wasn’t the first or second choice to star in the film.

Though popular, bitcoin not wave of future

Bitcoin. It’s everywhere. You see it in the news. People talk about it around the water cooler, and it appears on almost every internet ad. I wouldn’t be surprised if it started appearing in local paper opinion pieces.

Veteran uses talents to help other veterans

Robert Serge served in the United States Navy for 20 months as part of an ordnance laboratory test facility. As he puts it, “We designed harbor mines and stuff like that.”

Smiles plant seeds of hope

Before I sit down to write any commentary, I spend lots of time daily thinking about how to begin. What happened today? What needs addressing? I take so many things so seriously, I end up changing the focus daily. As soon as I submit one commentary, I begin thinking about the next. This one took longer than usual.