weather icon Clear

Letters to the Editor

Debate, not personal attacks, best way to discuss city issues

There has been much debate in the national media and locally about the First Amendment and freedom of speech, and what that looks like in a public meeting.

The City Council meeting on Nov. 14 gives one the opportunity to examine this important issue.

Does freedom of speech allow some members of the audience to bully, intimidate and mock others who disagree with their position? Should freedom of speech permit someone to call several women, to their face, “whores” because of their support on an issue? When people disagree, does that necessarily make the other side “liars”? Does a person have the right to flip off the mayor and/or council in a public meeting? How about multiple people shouting “Shame, shame, shame on you” after the council has come to a 4-1 vote after debating an issue for weeks and months, considering the legalities of and those most affected by their decision.

Another consideration was those present who are now conducting business with the city. They vocalized how offended they were by the blatant, religiously bigoted remarks they overheard in the audience. Another audience member said he would like to throw a bomb at the “three of them” — referring to council members. I wonder what the local fourth-graders are learning about democracy from attending our City Council meetings.

It has been said that this is what democracy “looks like.” Well, I believe that we can disagree civilly and respectfully. I also believe that it is imperative that every citizen of Boulder City should feel safe expressing their opinions in the City Council chambers. Let’s have the debate and not resort to personal attacks.

Peggy Leavitt

Boulder City Councilwoman

Building codes must be upheld

I am confused by the actions of four members of our City Council. We do not need to give the keys to the city to every developer who wants to build in Boulder City.

I am proud of the legacy I left, upholding the city’s building code and sign ordinance. Our members of the Planning Commission followed the same rules. Both of those things were important to me in the 1980s and ’90s. Allowing developers to make more money than required off our future quality of life is puzzling me.

Who is benefiting from these decisions? It is certainly not the citizens of Boulder City nor the future of our community, which is now at stake since every time our city has a developer in front of it. It appears our City Council must make the developer wealthier than they need be.

Our City Councils were working from the same assumptions I held until the city decided to violate its building code. We can succeed by following our building code and sign ordinance. Indeed, that is the only way to succeed. It is only about six homes.

When Robert Lewis of Lewis Homes brought his subdivision for the second half of the municipal golf course to the City Council in the late 1980s, he asked for the mineral rights underneath the homes. I told our then-city manager, George Forbes, to remove that from the negotiating point of view of the city. He told me that likely would end the deal. It did not.

That is the kind of City Council I would expect to have and assume that we will attempt to elect in 2019. It is the job of every city councilman to consider the community and its future quality of life in every decision that they make. That is what I did as a member of City Council and mayor twice from 1985 to 1997.

Eric Lundgaard

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
Attorney selection not surprising

Is history repeating itself? It certainly seems to be the case.

Series shares impact of fraud

Does everything always come down to how much money will be made? Do we know what truth is? Does truth still matter?

Longtime public servant’s efforts benefited city

In recent election years there have been very vocal attempts to disparage the name and reputation of Bruce Woodbury and his family.

Stand together against tyranny of minority

The nation of Israel, our strongest ally in the Middle East, commemorates Holocaust Day on April 8 this year. It is a grim reminder that over 6 million Jews perished at the hands of Nazi Germany and its confederates. The heroes of the Jewish resistance are also recognized and honored.

Continued vigilance against virus needed

As spring arrives with warmer temperatures, we are also beginning to see the slow return to our normal lives. As health experts have advised, the COVID-19 virus has not been defeated yet and we must continue to be responsible for our actions to protect those around us. But progress is being made.

Vote by process of elimination

As we close in on early voting for the April 6 election for two members of City Council, some thoughts have come to me. I interviewed 11 of the 13 candidates for the positions for my website, BoulderCityPodcast.com, and in cooperation with Boulder City Social. Only Ray Turner declined the invitation and the mysterious Brent Foutz didn’t respond at all.

Research candidates before voting

We have a crucial election for two vacant Boulder City council seats coming up. All of us have been told, “Get out and vote.”

Editorial: Government transparency essential

Spring arrives Saturday and with it will come warmer days and lots of sunshine. It’s something that we’re celebrating.

Society benefits from knowledge

The other day I was reminded of what it was like to be part of a protest surrounded by thousands of others. How did the huge protests happen? There was no internet or Facebook or Google telling people where to gather at what time. No one called me to meet them in Grant Park or on Dearborn Street in downtown Chicago, yet I got there, along with thousands of others.

Time is of the essence

This week has me thinking about time.