weather icon Clear

Economic justice based on victim mentality

To Rose Ann Miele, regarding your Nov. 21 column; I would like to address the issues you raise and the solutions you propose. The following are what I understand to be your premises and conclusion:

1. Economic justice means that everyone should have a home, food, employment, education and health care. Everyone does not have these things.

2. The federal government has the means to provide them.

3. Therefore, the federal government should step in and guarantee jobs to everyone that wants one.

Let’s start with premise one. You seem to be misapplying the term “justice,” which has become more and more common these days. The implication is that since life is difficult and there are people that are struggling to make ends meet, they have somehow been treated unjustly. This places the blame on everyone but the individual, a common diversion.

I know, I know, here comes another man just blaming the victims, but could you please tell me what they are a victim of? A victim of not being given a job? A victim of having to pay for child care? A victim of not owning a car? A victim of living in a town that is too expensive and too far away from their place of employment? If they are the victim, then there must be a perpetrator. Who is the perpetrator?

Of course there are exceptions, but rules are not made based on exceptions. Life can be “daunting,” but how do you make the logical leap that this is where the federal government should step in?

You claim that you couldn’t go to the private sector with your “great skills in a variety of areas,” but in reality, that is exactly how the private sector works. Hiring the best person for the job is in their best interest. You cannot blame the private sector for not valuing a college degree in U.S. immigration history.

On premise two, there is a fundamental disconnect between what the role of the federal government is and what progressives would like it to be. Fortunately, this role is not something that is fluid. Rather, it is clearly written in the constitution; have a look at Article I, Section 8.

You are incorrect in your assumption that the federal government has “means to provide for all.” The federal government only has what is given to it by us. The bloated federal government that we currently have is already unable to meet its obligations. The federal government does not produce, create or earn anything.

In order for the federal government to provide the funding for the program that you are proposing, it must take that money from someone else. Thievery. Your proposal is simply a veiled form of wealth redistribution, an inherently immoral concept. You get more of what you subsidize and less of what you penalize. Penalize discipline, hard work, ingenuity, grit and innovation with more and more taxes and you will surely get less of those things.

Since both premises are false, your conclusion is as well. Why is it that you skip over every other form of government and go straight to the feds? What about self-government, family government, church government, local government and state government. In the representative republic, limited government, free market capitalistic, individual liberty valuing society that we live, aid is meant to work from the bottom up through charitable living, not the top down through coercion. A lack of self-government cannot be made up for by any other form of government.

Because some jobs do not have monetary value does not mean that they aren’t valuable. My wife should not be compensated by the government for raising our kids. I should not be compensated by the government for looking after my sick neighbor or grandmother. This is a gross misunderstanding of societal roles and their inherent value.

In the United States, our rights are not derived from the federal government. They are, according to our constitution, endowed by our Creator. … life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. None of these rights require taking from someone else. On the other hand, the things that you declare to constitute “economic justice” — housing, food, employment, education and health care — all require something to be taken from someone else if they are to be provided by the government.

We want “free college,” but who pays for it? The government. Where does the government get the money? Taxpayers. Who are the taxpayers? Every working American. So, who pays for your college, housing, food, job guarantee and health insurance? We do. Enough with the victim mentality.

In the spirit of Thanksgiving, imagine the world the way that the pilgrims saw it in 1620. Life was hard, kids got sick, food was scarce, housing was nonexistent. They had no one to blame; they were not victims. There were no jobs, but there was plenty of work to be done.

Ken O’Shaunghnessy is a five-year resident of Boulder City and father of five.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
Celebrate our freedom

Saturday is our nation’s 244th birthday, and that’s something worth celebrating.

Pandemic calls for citizens to care for, about each other

For this column I looked back on the columns I have written over the past few months. At the beginning of March my column focused on the rollout of the new marketing campaign for Las Vegas and how it would benefit our city, as well. What followed within two weeks changed our lives in ways that have brought hardships to many of us.

Kindness, compassion still exist

It seems these days that hate and anger are everywhere. You can’t pick up a newspaper, watch television news or even scan social media without reading about or seeing something bad.

Nation watches ‘good, bad, ugly’

We all have witnessed the extraordinary in the human race with the recent launch of the SpaceX rocket and space vehicle “Crew Dragon.” It was a joint effort led by a private team of scientists, engineers and technicians, along with NASA and its team of experts. It was an unbelievable venture and a first for a private enterprise to accomplish.

Terms of airport leases cannot be ignored

Thank you Roger Gros. I read with respect your article in the Boulder City Review, dated June 10. Being from an aviation family myself, I appreciate your opinions on the airport leases. Unfortunately, you ignored the primary facts of the disagreement, which are the leases, in order to make impassioned arguments on why the city should not enforce its rights under the expiring leases at Boulder City Municipal Airport. If you had included the contractual terms of the leases in your article, none of the arguments you subsequently made would have any meaning.

Education must be applied to be helpful

As I’ve watched, via my computer, the unfolding of events since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, I’ve tried to stay focused on what I, one person among 7.8 billion worldwide can possibly do to make our lives better.

We should be united as nation

I was there with Martin Luther King Jr. working for civil rights. I was there with a black preacher working for equal rights. I was there in tears and held the hand of a black friend tell of the way he was treated as a young man in south Georgia. I was there when the Civil Rights Act of 1964 legally ended discrimination. I was there and observed the people of our nation wanted change and the end of discrimination. Discrimination and injustice still exist and always will, but I was there and have seen amazing progress in race relations.

Violence, riots will not stop president’s re-election

No conspiracies this month, folks, merely a string of coincidences with the same mission: to avenge the 2016 presidential election and prevent President Donald Trump’s re-election.

Targeting of journalists by police must end

There is no longer any question that law enforcement agents are deliberately targeting journalists covering the George Floyd protests. There are now dozens of examples clearly showing police in cities throughout the U.S. aiming at, shooting, tear-gassing, pushing, hitting, shoving and arresting reporters who have clearly identified themselves as working journalists.

Mayor needs to tell whole story

We’ve beginning to see a pattern with our new mayor and City Council. And it’s quite disturbing to those of us who wanted transparency and honesty from our newly elected officials.