98°F
weather icon Windy

Planners seek new research-development zone

Boulder City’s zoning ordinance could be changing, as the Planning Commission is recommending a new research and development zone for approximately 50 acres of city-owned land in the Eldorado Valley.

The land is currently zoned government open space and is part of the approved drone test range on city-owned land.

According to City Planner Susan Danielewicz, in 2013 the Federal Aviation Administration designated Nevada as one of six states authorized to test commercial drone technology and Boulder City as one of three cities approved for it within the state.

In 2016, Boulder City partnered with The Aerodrome LLC to develop a world-class public airport for unmanned aircraft systems on property in the Eldorado Valley, she added in city documents.

“The proposed droneport will be setting the standard for droneports nationwide,” Community Development Director Brok Armantrout told the planning commissioners at their monthly meeting Feb. 15.

Because of this partnership and its hope for more organizations and businesses to come for research and development, a new research and development zone for the city is warranted.

“All activities there point to joint projects for development,” Danielewicz said at the meeting. “We need to create a zone that represents it.”

The scope of the proposed zone is to allow and promote the development of research and development facilities as needed through public and/or private ownership. The uses permitted through the zoning classification include, but are not limited to, energy generation, technology development and ancillary facilities.

“The reason for the relative lack of detailed zoning regulations is because the intent of this zone, like the ER (energy resource) zone, is that activities in the zone will be subject to leases on city-owned land,” Danielewicz wrote in a staff report.

The new zone would require an amendment to the master plan, as well as an amendment to rezone the approximately 50 acres in the Eldorado Valley.

Several planning commissioners expressed concern because of its proximity to the municipal airport.

“What has been done to prevent air traffic issues with the airport?” asked Planning Commissioner Steve Walton.

“It’s quite distant, well beyond the airport and overlay requirements,” answered Danielewicz. “There’s no conflict.”

“Well there’s no conflict on the map,” responded Walton, who added that as a pilot he has knowledge of it, as well as knowledge of schools that use it.

“I think there is a large area of potential conflict,” he said. “Have there been any conversations with the airport?”

Planning Commissioner Ernest Biacsi also suggested the city talk with the FAA about its requirements for drone usage near an airport.

“They should talk to the FAA because they are the ones that have jurisdiction,” he said.

In response to these concerns, Armantrout said the FAA has been involved with the project since the beginning, and the airport has been briefed to the extent of its authority, which stops at the airport.

Conflicts between drones and planes would also fall under FAA protocol, and in those situations the pilots have been briefed about what to do.

“We’re on the map, and this would be a great opportunity for not only us but also the state of Nevada,” he added.

Commissioners approved 5-1 the recommendation to add the new zoning classification, as well as amending the master plan and the rezoning for the 50 acres.

Commissioner Jim Giannosa voted against the recommendation, and commissioner Fritz McDonald was absent from the meeting.

In other actions, commissioners:

■ Reviewed the funds spent for the Community Development Block Grant program during the fiscal years of 2015-2016 and 2016-2017.

■ Held a public hearing and approved a recommendation for the City Council to give public service funds from the Community Block Grant to Emergency Aid of Boulder City and Lend A Hand of Boulder City.

■ Held a public hearing and approved a variance for 597 Malaga Court, which allows a recreational vehicle garage to be partially located in the front yard.

Contact reporter Celia Shortt Goodyear at cgoodyear@bouldercityreview.com or at 702-586-9401. Follow her on Twitter @csgoodyear.

MOST READ
LISTEN TO THE TOP FIVE HERE
THE LATEST
Hittin’ the town

Photos by Ron Eland/Boulder City Review

Update on city utility projects

Sometimes the good information comes from unexpected places.

City reallocates $750,000 for fiscal year 2025

More than a year ago, in a Boulder City Council discussion about budgeting, Mayor Joe Hardy, in two sentences, summed up the most basic truth about city budgets.

Third extension for portico funding

About once a month, before the start of the city council meeting, the members of the council meet wearing their hats as the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) and dole out money to reimburse businesses and homeowners in the historic district for qualifying work done to their properties.

Public weighs in on purchase

With last week’s announcement in the Boulder City Review that three longtime residents/businessmen purchased the former Central Market building and their plans to bring in a small grocery chain, there’s been plenty of input from the public.

Trio looks to bring new grocery store to town

If one were to ask 25 Boulder City residents what the town is missing, you’d probably get a few different answers like affordable housing or a movie theater. But the overwhelming answer would likely be the same – a second grocery store.

City awards $1.6M for pool design

Back in March 2024, Councilwoman Sherri Jorgensen said, “I can’t even imagine what it would cost in 2028.”

City transfers bond capacity

Kevin Hickey, of the Nevada Rural Housing Authority, has been making pretty much the same presentation to the council annually thanking the city for transferring nearly $1 million in bond capacity to the group he represents.

Council confusion: The leash law saga continues

Three statements — notably, none of them from members of the city council — best illustrated the difficulties residents (both dog-loving and not) have had for at least four years when it comes to the issue of off-leash dogs in public parks.