87°F
weather icon Clear

Plan for RV park moves forward, council discusses future projects

Updated September 29, 2022 - 2:33 pm

The Boulder City Council introduced a controversial new historic preservation ordinance, as well as discussed multiple rezoning bills, capital improvement plan spending and a burial monument during its Tuesday, Sept. 27, meeting.

Historic preservation

The council officially introduced the proposed historic preservation ordinance that was rejected by the Planning Commission in late August.

If approved, the ordinance would establish maintenance standards for all buildings in the historic district, create a Historic Preservation Commission, require approval for any outside changes to historic district buildings and make it a misdemeanor for breaking ordinance rules, with each day the rule is broken counting as a separate offense.

Though this was just an introduction and the members of the council did not comment on the bill itself in the meeting, several public comments discussed the proposed ordinance. Multiple comments defended the proposal, saying that Boulder City is already good at preservation but needs to do better. Several comments supported the idea of preservation, but denounced the methods of enforcement.

Councilman Matt Fox said he disagrees with the ordinance.

“The people that are buying (historic houses) already upkeep them,” he said. “And we don’t need to penalize them and fine them or give them misdemeanors because their yards are a little rough. I just think we’re overstepping.”

Councilwoman Sherri Jorgensen said that she is still gathering information from Boulder City residents before she has a defined stance on this issue.

Capital improvements

Finance Director Diane Pelletier, City Manager Taylour Tedder and Budget Manager Angela Manninen presented the status of the capital improvement plan and the first look at the 2024-28 plan.

The plan specifies how funds will be spent on projects to improve the infrastructure, according to the Boulder City website. Pelletier said that the plan differs from the operating budget because it continues over multiple years, whereas the operating budget closes at the end of the year.

Pelletier reported that eight outside-funded projects and 11 general-funded projects were completed in the fiscal year 2022, which ended in June.

Going into the fiscal year of 2023, 64 projects were approved, costing an estimated total of $48.5 million.

The largest project, projected to cost $2 million, will replace the irrigation system at the Boulder City Golf Course in an effort to conserve water. The 2023 fiscal year also has projects such as a municipal court remodel, city facilities broadband upgrade and a dog park.

Manninen read out 24 projects slated for the 2024 fiscal year, which will be up for tentative approval by the council in November. Some of those projects include traffic intersection improvements and fire department training facilities.

Notably, the fire department training tower project depends on funding from the sale of Tract 350, which hasn’t happened yet; the backup plan is for $7 million from the capital improvement plan that will be voted upon in November.

Mayor Kiernan McManus criticized the capital improvement plan for planning projects related to utilities seemingly without consulting the city’s Utility Advisory Committee.

“We have a number of people on that committee that have a lot of experience,” said McManus, “and no input is referenced in this presentation from the Utility Advisory Committee. They’ve been in operation now for a couple of years. I know that I’ve heard at their meetings that they do have recommendations. They do have ideas on this.”

McManus also criticized the plan for planning and budgeting projects without completing them.

He said that he was especially concerned that some funds for these projects came from the federal government, through the American Rescue Plan Act, and that funding comes with a time limit to be used before reverting back to the federal government.

Jorgensen said that she has confidence in the plan’s ability to complete its future projects.

“We’re going to move forward, we’re going to accomplish these things. We’re going to use the money for the benefit of this community,” she said.

Master plan amended

The council voted 4-1 in favor of amending the master city’s plan use designation for 74 acres from open lands and parks and recreation to the community commercial designation. This new label allows the proposed recreational vehicle park and cabin renting facility to move forward with leasing negotiations for the newly designated land.

“I think it’s a win-win,” said Fox. “Bring people in without expanding the housing market or anything like that.”

Councilman James Howard Adams said that the RV park and cabin rental facility itself is a good fit for Boulder City, but was concerned that the new designation could be bad for the land if something else were to take the RV park’s place. He ultimately voted in support of the master plan land use amendment.

“I want us to continue having these conversations,” said Adams, “so that we can reach the decision of what is best for Boulder City.”

The only vote against the change was from McManus, whose main concern is how close the park will be to the public golf course in the same area.

“My biggest concern is that we’re tying a private project into a public facility,” said McManus. “And that’s a facility that we don’t know what the future of it’s going to be.”

McManus and other members of the council took issue with the lease presented for the facility, which reportedly was written to last 99 years in the initial proposal.

“To keep this under lease for a century to a single entity is just bad public policy,” said McManus.

Councilwoman Claudia Bridges and Jorgensen ensured that the lease wasn’t set in stone with the passing of this motion. Lease negotiations are the next step in the council’s process of approving this project.

Contact Mark Credico at mcredico@reviewjournal.com. Follow him on Twitter @MarkCredicoII.

MOST READ
LISTEN TO THE TOP FIVE HERE
THE LATEST
Titus, mayor tout project

Saying that “businesses are the lifeblood of our community,” Mayor Joe Hardy helped lead a brief press conference Friday to discuss work to be done as part of Phase II of the Nevada Way Reconstruction Project.

Official: Still hope in water fight

Nevada’s lead Colorado River negotiator said he’s still going to bat for the state behind the scenes as water managers await a final word from the Trump administration.

Chamber hands out annual awards

Last Friday night, dozens of local business owners filled the Elaine K. Smith building.

Architectural contract awarded for new pavilion

For more than 20 years, the pavilion at Boulder Creek Golf Course has hosted state of the city addresses, galas, weddings, fundraising events and class reunions.

Golf team looks to duplicate success

Bringing back a handful of experience and the best golfer in the classification, Boulder City High School girls golf will look to capture their third consecutive 3A state championship.

Mother Nature forces early end to game

A rain cancellation ruined the coaching debut of Boulder City High School football coach Chris Render, who saw his team in a tight 14-7 battle with Valley on Aug. 14, before lightning called off the remaining action with less than four minutes to play in the first half.

New faces to help lead girls soccer

With a lot of new faces expected to make an impact for Boulder City High School girls soccer, the season couldn’t have started off any better after defeating 4A Sunrise Mountain 3-0 in their season opener on Aug. 13.

What is long-term care?

Long-term care refers to a range of services and support for people who need help with everyday activities over an extended period due to aging, chronic illness, disability, injury, or cognitive conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease.

Veterans, seniors: Scarcity of low-cost housing

Housing of all types for all sorts of individuals seems to be a buzz-word these days. But seniors and veterans especially seem to be lacking when it comes to locating reasonably affordable residences in reasonably decent neighborhoods around the state. What’s a body to do?