weather icon Clear

Performance anxiety abounds

From the moment we are born until the day we die, someone somewhere is evaluating our performance.

So why, in this era of governmental transparency and against state law, is City Manager David Fraser upset with Tuesday’s open review of his performance?

Before the job-performance evaluations began, he complained, stating he thinks “open evaluations are inappropriate.”

However, City Attorney Dave Olsen, who received far more criticism during his last performance review, welcomed the opportunity, knowing he had listened to what council members had said and made changes.

Good for him.

Fraser, who said council members would not like it if their job performances were evaluated in public, was clearly not thinking about how their actions and work are actually judged every time one of their constituents heads to the ballot box or sits in the gallery during their bimonthly meetings.

Politicians and city leaders are constantly under scrutiny, especially as elections approach. Daily, thousands of calls are made to registered voters asking them who they plan to vote for or to give an approval rating of a politician’s performance. Isn’t that a type of evaluation?

The results of these surveys and polls are almost always made public.

So are many other types of performance reviews, if you stop to think about it.

As babies learn new skills, even something as simple as sitting up, their parents celebrate these accomplishments through calls to relatives and posts on social media.

When babies become children and head to school, star students are singled out to share their “A grade” work with fellow students. In performing arts classes, those who excel are given starring roles and solos. These, too, are public evaluations.

And once those children grow up to become adults and continue to perform in concerts, movies and plays, their performances are regularly reviewed by critics. In fact, critical reviews are often crucial to them advancing their art or getting accolades in the form of Grammy, Tony, Emmy and Academy awards.

Putting star performers aside, on an everyday level people constantly review performances, just maybe not in the same way you would think about what a review is.

For example, whenever a person chooses to buy something, he or she is making a choice to praise the performance of the manufacturer or retailer or service provider. When you get a new Ford or a Honda, you are essentially giving a positive review or vote of approval to Ford or Honda.

Granted, those purchases are not always the best choices and sometimes we have to make repairs or returns. Yet, if you stop to think about it, isn’t that kinda the same as getting a job-performance evaluation and being told there are areas where you need to make improvements?

No one likes being told they are not doing a good job, especially in front of others. Would the complaints still exist if they were expecting glowing reviews? Perhaps. But that should have been a consideration when making a career choice. If you enter the public sector, expect the public to watch and comment on what you do.

Hali Bernstein Saylor is editor of the Boulder City Review. She can be reached at hsaylor@bouldercityreview.com or at 702-586-9523. Follow @HalisComment on Twitter.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
What are you going to vote for?

I’m not asking “who” you are voting for. I’m asking “what” you voting for. When we cast our ballots this November, we won’t be casting our votes for an individual, even though it seems like it. We will be casting our votes for an ideal, a concept of democracy for our nation’s republic.

Congress has way to fix unemployment problems

Folks don’t like to face problems. They’re much easier to ignore. Everyone chooses. Face problems and find a solution or have them blow up in your face. Or, maybe you’ll get lucky and the problems vanish. Or, you carry them around and suffer the consequences day by day, usually for far too long.

New forum allows locals to share thoughts

Today we are introducing what we hope will become a regular feature in the Boulder City Review.

City needs ‘imperfect’ mayor who can see all sides

After only a few articles, demands of life are such that sadly, this will be my last article in the Boulder City Review. So I leave you with what I feel Boulder City needs.

Officers’ heroic actions merit recognition

Despite some who believe I should overdose on a lifetime supply of humble pie, I stand by my May 13 article wherein I claimed the coronavirus was being used by many to seize power. Merely observe those in power as they flaunt their own rules and change the threshold for restarting the economy.

Mayor does much to better Boulder City

Competent leadership of a family or another entity usually comes with weighty responsibilities and the absolute certainty that someone won’t be happy with some of the decisions made.

City needs new mayor now

There is an African proverb that translates to the familiar saying that it takes a village to raise a child. This literally means an entire community of people must interact with children for those children to experience and grow in a safe and healthy environment. What’s my point? Right now, city hall isn’t united and our village isn’t healthy.

Build bridges, not barriers

Books and movies are meant to entertain, and often educate us. In today’s world, as we spend more time at home, the need to be entertained and educated has never been greater.

Council acts follow city charter

The blaring headline, the denigrating letters to the editor, the smoke thrown into our already hazy skies. All these false efforts result in the editor of this newspaper calling for the end of chaos at City Hall. Dire statements are cast forward that any action by the current City Council to govern this city are not worth our while.

City wrong to mandate voluntary unit

City Council’s action Tuesday night to require the Boulder City Police Department to maintain a mounted unit is wrong.