weather icon Clear

Authentic voices needed on TV, in movies

“Atypical,” which airs on Netflix, is a not-terribly-new show, considering there are now four seasons, featuring Sam Gardner, a teen on the autism spectrum. The show begins with Sam, played by Keir Gilchrist, in a session with his therapist. She tells him to open himself up to the possibility of having a relationship.

The next scene opens to family dinner where Sam announces that his therapist wants him to have sex. Then, because of his compulsion to tell the truth, he qualifies that she phrased it differently. It’s a funny enough moment, if not terribly original. Viewers immediately like Sam’s quirky spunk, and feel for him as he unskillfully tries to follow his therapist’s advice.

However, throughout the episode, I found myself cringing at Sam’s representation, which felt like an amplified and stereotypical depiction of a person living with autism, and a contrived backstory of inflated family drama. So, the question becomes: Does “Atypical” represent a positive move toward creating an awareness of ableness for neurotypical members of society, or is there a better way?

Partly problematic is that the show uses the same kinds of tropes that have been around since the eighties, with family shows like “Full House” and “Saved by the Bell,” the only real exclusion being the added grit of discussing sexuality in a family-type show setting and the absence of a laugh track to bolster emotional moments.

We see the older sister playing the role of protector and tough guy, the parents who can’t relate to their son and can’t seem to get their life together enough to have a viable relationship in the midst of the trial of their son’s diagnosis. The ethically gray therapist is seen as a bit bumbling and narcissistic. The co-worker is a sufficiently depraved character to allow the audience a good laugh when paired against Sam’s unwitting chastity.

All of which brings us back to the point of Sam himself. As Sam is exposed again and again to humiliating experiences, portrayed lightly enough to be laughable, it is clear that Sam is not really the object of sympathy. He is the punchline of the jokes. The audience should laugh at Sam wearing headphones on his first date to cancel coffee shop noise that makes it hard for him to focus. When he invites a cute redhead on a date to the parking lot, she laughs at how hilarious Sam is.

The audience can’t help but laugh when Sam throws said adorable redhead off the bed later. That scene ends with her screaming, “What is wrong with you? Is there something wrong with your brain?” The answer should be nothing.

As a viewer though, I was disappointed hearing the words spoken aloud. I was also unsure about the meaning. Obviously, she was mean and bad, but I also thought she was rather set up to fail that test. I went into problem-solving mode and reasoned, “shouldn’t his autism be a leading part of the conversation?” Then I pivoted, always an uncomfortable experience, I recentered my own awareness and corrected with the idea that, “why should someone who is non-neurotypical have to announce a disability to receive compassion?”

I think it’s a really important question to ask viewers, but without creating a concrete line as to who Sam is, the show fails to effectively navigate that conflict by creating solid guidance. Instead, it places responsibility for real understanding back into the lap of people already living with autism.

Finally, one of the biggest points of conflict with the first season of “Atypical” has been the complete lack of autistic representation among the cast and crew. It should be noted that the show has done much to change that initial failing in representation since the first season, and has been nominated for Satellite and Peabody awards since.

I am not sure whether watching further seasons will warrant my attention. I think I would probably skip the remainder of the first and skip to subsequent seasons if I did. But I think the most important take-away for me, is how important the recentering process is. To really think about the underlying messages and hold entertainment companies to account in providing authentic voices at every level of creation.

The opinions expressed above belong solely to the author and do not represent the views of the Boulder City Review. They have been edited solely for grammar, spelling and style, and have not been checked for accuracy of the viewpoints.

Alycia Calvert is a longtime Boulder City resident. She has lived here with her husband and children for the past 15 years. She will graduate with her Master of Fine Arts in May, and is excited to get more time for writing. She loves hiking, biking, kayaking, supporting Boulder City’s small business community and thinking weird wandering thoughts.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
Home is where you are welcome

When I was a sophomore in high school, I learned the truth from Thomas Wolfe’s book, “You Can’t Go Home Again” when I realized I couldn’t go back to the life I’d had the year before.

We deflect, not confront, water problems

More photo ops, more hand wringing, more florid speeches by officials, more federal money doled out without effect, more breast beating about hollow and inadequate efforts at water conservation regularly occur here and throughout the American West.

Electric vehicles not really friendly to environment

As somewhat of a gearhead, I am fascinated with the newest technologies relating to electric-powered vehicles, otherwise known as EVs. Tesla is thought to be the leader in these technologies. Still, others, such as Hyundai, Honda, Toyota and Kia, along with the major car manufacturers in the USA, have been making significant strides in developing electric vehicles with outstanding performance.

Pictures of past tell many stories

I know this is an opinion column and what I’ve written here is less of an opinion piece and more of an amusing anecdote. I hope you’ll forgive me for that. It was simply too good not to share and I think it’s a nice, if mundane, example of why Boulder City is such a lovely place to live.

Water conservation efforts to thwart drought delusional

I was entering my junior year at Boulder City High School when Lake Mead reached its top elevation of 1,225 feet in 1983. Water rushed over Hoover Dam’s fully extended spillway gates with such force that even an umbrella didn’t keep us dry from the downpour caused by its rebounding spray. Since then, the lake has dropped 185 feet, including a 170-foot decline over the last 22 years during the worst Colorado River system drought in recorded history.

Guest commentary: Are fair elections possible in digital age?

I am wondering whether or not we should be paying attention to how our elections are being conducted in Nevada as to whether or not our votes are actually counted fairly. I suspect that the voting machines have a lot to do with the situation.

A retreat to push us forward

Succeeding in today’s business climate is not an easy task. It’s even more challenging for women, who have had to overcome decades of inequality in the workplace while juggling traditional roles of keeper of the home and family.

Keep ‘wet blankets’ out of water talks

“Blanket statements” are usually meant to cover wide swaths of a topic. A “wet blanket,” on the other hand, implies stifling everything it touches or, in this context, greatly limiting a topic’s discussion. If this column comes somewhere between one or the other, I’ll consider it a success.

Reparations needed from president’s supporters

What exactly are reparations? The Merriam-Webster definition is: “The act of making amends, offering expiation or giving satisfaction for a wrong, injury, or something done or given as amends.”