97°F
weather icon Clear

Council talks dog licensing

When the subject of pets and the general welfare of animals comes up, it can make for passionate responses.

Such has been the case in Boulder City since the subject of possibly allowing pet breeding first came up in public comment in a meeting last year.

That passion can be super-charged by the increasingly online culture which often serves as a giant game of Telephone, with ideas that start as allegations soon being presented as though they were facts. After a couple of BC neighborhood Facebook groups began an organized letter-writing campaign to the city council opposing pet breeding, the Review heard allegations from some people regarding council members and decided to investigate. This is what we found.

Too many (and unlicensed) pets?

The allegation was that most of the members of the city council were keeping unlicensed pets.

Verdict: Mostly untrue

Council member Matt Fox did not respond to an email asking how many pets were in his home and if they were licensed. Mayor Joe Hardy and Councilmember Sherri Jorgensen do not have any pets currently. Councilmember Steve Walton has two dogs, one of which is licensed. The other, according to an email reply to the question, is a puppy who is not yet old enough to be spayed. Walton said that once the dog has been spayed, it will be licensed.

Council member Cokie Booth has, at the time of this writing, four dogs, a fact she has addressed in council discussions about the issue of breeding and a proposed companion ordinance to allow for a foster/fancier permit. None of Booth’s dogs are currently licensed. In an email reply to the question, she said, “My dogs have microchips, rabies tags, and all of their shots. But l do not have a license from Boulder City. It has been about three years. The reason is they don’t bill you (for renewal) once you get a license. You must remember to go back every year. Not an excuse, I just don’t remember to run in and pay for dog tag. I have talked to the city about billing once someone gets a dog tag.”

Conflict of interest ?

The allegation was that one of the council members vocally in favor of permitting some breeding in BC has a conflict because a family member wants to breed dogs.

Verdict: Unsupported (at best)

The allegation specifically targeted Walton. In an email, he said that, while he does have a family member with two dogs of the same breed, that they have no interest in breeding.

The impetus for the proposal also appears to be less sinister than the rumors allege.

In September of 2023, a member of the public addressed the council and asked that they consider allowing breeding. Walton said, “I asked the city attorney about dog breeding permits, and she notified me that Boulder City was not in compliance with state law, and that we (the city) would need to take the matter up to come into compliance with state law regarding dog breeding.”

The city attorney was referring to NRS 574.353, which says that every city council in the state “shall adopt an ordinance requiring each breeder in the incorporated area of the city to obtain an annual permit.” The code in Boulder City currently says that breeders must have a permit and a business license but provides no avenue for obtaining them.

Untangling the proposals

When the idea for adding both a breeding permit and a fancier/foster permit (which would allow someone to have more than the aggregate of three animals in a household as allowed currently) was brought up by city staff, both Walton and Booth, who have been the most vocal in their support for the measure, said that they were not in support of combining the two issues.

“I also suggested the topic of breeding be separated from the foster/fancier discussion because they are two distinct topics with different information,” Walton said. “I suggest splitting the conversation ‘in half’ for that reason.”

Booth was even more forceful. “I have never wanted to allow breeding. I did want to have a fancier permit. The city attorney told me that we needed a breeding ordinance and so I supported the combination. But I have never wanted and do not want to see any breeding in Boulder City.”

THE LATEST
It’s (un)official

“Every vote counts and every vote has not been counted.”

City council to mull recruitment firms

When departing and now former city manager Taylour Tedder was on his way out, he took some steps to try to smooth out the transition to a new city executive in the form of five recruitment firms vying for the call to be hired to conduct a nationwide search for his replacement.

Brown proud to represent BC in Nationals

For those who are into the rodeo scene, you may want to remember the name Aiden Brown in years to come.

Church seeks senior housing

Leaders of the Boulder City United Methodist Church have a project in the works that they feel will benefit many in the community but understand those who may have concerns.

Fancier/foster permit back on city council agenda

If you call in to a city council meeting for public comment twice in one meeting, you officially qualify as a gadfly. (noun: 1) a fly that bites livestock, especially a horsefly, warble fly, or botfly. 2) an annoying person, especially one who provokes others into action by criticism.) Fred Voltz, already quoted in these pages for comments on other issues, also addressed the issue of pet breeding, likening the practice to prostitution or the dealing of narcotics.

Liquor Board approves BC Company Store request

In the 1930s, the original Boulder City Company Store included a “club room.” The city was officially dry until the late 1960s, so booze would not have been officially served. Except it was.

Dollar Tree takes over 99 Cents

Chances are that many will be giving their two-cents worth regarding the news that 99 Cent Only Stores, including the one in Boulder City, have been thrown a lifeline by a former competitor — Dollar Tree.

Master plan to accommodate energy storage

The moves to develop much of the Eldorado Valley for solar energy uses that has brought Boulder City millions of dollars in lease revenue — enough to make it feasible for a city of just 15,000 souls to consider spending upward of $40 million on a new municipal pool complex — took another step forward on May 28 as the city council voted unanimously to amend the master plan and zoning map that would allow for the creation of a battery-based energy storage facility.