101°F
weather icon Clear

City, court extend personnel agreement

One could be excused for assuming that an item on the city council’s agenda for the June 25 meeting was somehow related to the concept of free speech if one had only read the agenda and none of the attachments. It was, after all, referred to as First Amendment.

It turns out that it’s not about that First Amendment. But understanding it does mean taking a look at some history.

“First” is just a reference to the first time that an existing agreement between the city and its own municipal court is being amended. Who, one might ask, does the city have a fairly lengthy contract agreement with its own court? A court that the council appoints the judge to? Here is where the history part comes in.

Back in the depths of the 2008-2014 financial meltdown, the city of Sparks in northern Nevada told the municipal court to cut the salaries of some court employees. Traditionally, the city had made all personnel decisions for the court. The municipal court disputed the city’s ability to require it to reduce the salaries of municipal court employees who were exempt from the city charter provisions and civil service rules that govern city employees. So, the court sued the city.

The case made its way the the Nevada Supreme Court and on May 30, 2013, the court issued a decision known as Sparks v. Sparks, 129 Nev. Adv. Op. 38 holding that municipal courts are co-equal branches of government with authority to manage their own affairs without interference from other separate co-equal government branches.

This upset the proverbial apple cart in many, if not most, jurisdictions, including in Boulder City where, again, traditionally, the city had made all personnel decisions for the court.

The ruling did not say that the city could not act in that fashion. It did say that, in order to do so, there had to be a contract agreement in place. Without an agreement, the separation of powers doctrine would not allow the city to have any authority over municipal court personnel.

So, in late 2014, the city and the court (represented by the municipal court judge who is also appointed by the city council) entered into an agreement to delineate the administrative responsibilities of each entity when it comes to personnel and human resource issues.

The current agreement expired on July 1. The resolution actually amended the agreement (hence the whole “first amendment” thing) to extend it by an additional six months so that in runs through the remainder of 2024.

According to city staff, many other jurisdictions in Nevada are in the process of updating their agreements with their own municipal courts.

“Additionally, the city’s collective bargaining agreements were also recently finalized,” read the staff report. “City and court staff would like more time to work on a more long-term extension of the current agreement comparing ours with other similar agreements in Nevada to make sure it contains all pertinent terms and conditions. This amendment would extend the current agreement six months to allow staff this time to work on a more long-term amended restated agreement.”

Unrelated but still of note, assuming a new agreement is signed before early January of 2025, signing that agreement may just end up being one of the final official acts taken by Judge Victor Miller, who will be retiring. Miller has also served as justice of the peace for the Boulder Township of Clark County for well more than 40 years and decided not to run for re-election this year. Christopher Tilman was elected to that position in the recent primary election and will take over in January.

While the office of judge and justice have been occupied, with only a few years of exception, by the same person for about 75 years, there is no guarantee that the council will continue that tradition.

MOST READ
THE LATEST
Toll Brothers gets split decision

The development of the area near Boulder Creek Golf Course known as Tract 350 (the sale of which is slated to pay for the majority of the planned replacement for the aging municipal pool) may have hit a snag last week as the planning commission voted 5-1 to deny the developers’ request to build houses closer to the street than is allowed under current law.

Council gives nod to 185 new hangars

There is at least one part of Boulder City that is set to see growth in the coming years. A lot of growth.

Boulder City ready to celebrate America

Boulder City resident James Cracolici may have put it best when he called the annual July 4 Damboree, “The crown jewel of all events held in Boulder City.”

BC can ban backyard breeders

Although there is nothing on any city agenda yet, the resolution of the issue of whether pet breeding will be allowed in Boulder City took a huge step forward last week as Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford released an official opinion on the intent and limitations of state law that had been requested by city staff last year.

Completion dates for two road projects pushed back

Mayor Joe Hardy tacitly acknowledged that Boulder City gets, perhaps, more than its fair share of funding from the Regional Transportation Commission, given the city’s size.

Businesses recognized at Chamber awards night

The Boulder City Chamber of Commerce’s annual installation and awards night featured many business owners in town and even had an appearance, albeit an A.I.-generated one, by Audrey Hepburn.

Parallel parking approved

Like so many other things in the world of Boulder City government, the issue of reconfiguring parking in the historic downtown area along Nevada Way, which generated enough heat to cause council members to delay a decision up until the last possible moment, ended with more of a whimper than a bang.

Ways to reduce summer power bills

Now that the thermometer is on the rise outdoors, the cost to cool homes and businesses on the inside is doing the same.