weather icon Clear

Mayor misses key points of historic preservation

Thank you, Mayor (Rod) Woodbury for sharing your perspective (Boulder City Review, Aug. 3) of what historic preservation means to you. It’s encouraging that you agree with what many in our community already understand and believe in: “Preserving the past. It’s vital in a city like ours.”

Unfortunately, your “five p’s of preservation lesson” of historic preservation dos and don’ts illustrate a lack of understanding of our community’s values about its historic resources and what it takes to preserve and promote them.

Priorities: The city’s preservation priorities were established in 1983 when the Boulder City Historic District was added to the National Register of Historic Places. Since then, important and contributing buildings continue to be demolished or substantially altered, which compromises the integrity of the district.

Boulder City’s Municipal Code “Historic Preservation” (2000) must be updated so that with community input and support, the city can assume a greater responsibility for prioritizing protection of our historic district.

Procedures: All across the country and municipalities have successfully established procedures for prioritizing and protecting historic resources and districts to the benefit of historic property owners and developers. The city’s Historic Preservation Committee has the desire and resources to establish such procedures, most of which are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, established in the 1970s.

Plans: All of the following plans offer a common vision and priority for preserving, maintaining and exploiting Boulder City’s historic legacy: Boulder City Business Impact Analysis: Interstate 11 (2015); Envision 2020 (2012); Master Plan (2003; updated 2009); Redevelopment Plan (2009); and Strategic Plan (2000).

Purpose: An important purpose of preservation is to encourage the integration of the past with the present and the future. Preservation does not halt growth or change. By utilizing the above mentioned priorities, procedures and existing plans, the city is poised to support and develop a vibrant local economy by embracing preservation as a tool for economic revitalization.

In addition, the city should encourage developers of profit opportunities with the use of local, stat, and federal incentives to develop historic properties. Preservation of our core downtown should be the priority to spur revitalization and economic development, not the Hoover Dam Gateway project.

Public vs. private: As you stated, preservation of the Boulder Dam Hotel is a good example of how governments and the private sector can work together to protect and promote important historic resources. However, one historic hotel does not make a historic district. I challenge the city to: fully embrace preservation of all historic resources as a primary community value; willingly stand up for preservation’s value in the face of easy solutions (i.e. Hoover Dam Gateway project); and, continue developing partnerships with preservationists by offering incentives that support private investments for preserving historic resources.

Blair Davenport works for the National Park Service as a cultural resources manager and is a member of the Boulder City Historic Preservation Committee.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
What are you going to vote for?

I’m not asking “who” you are voting for. I’m asking “what” you voting for. When we cast our ballots this November, we won’t be casting our votes for an individual, even though it seems like it. We will be casting our votes for an ideal, a concept of democracy for our nation’s republic.

Congress has way to fix unemployment problems

Folks don’t like to face problems. They’re much easier to ignore. Everyone chooses. Face problems and find a solution or have them blow up in your face. Or, maybe you’ll get lucky and the problems vanish. Or, you carry them around and suffer the consequences day by day, usually for far too long.

New forum allows locals to share thoughts

Today we are introducing what we hope will become a regular feature in the Boulder City Review.

City needs ‘imperfect’ mayor who can see all sides

After only a few articles, demands of life are such that sadly, this will be my last article in the Boulder City Review. So I leave you with what I feel Boulder City needs.

Officers’ heroic actions merit recognition

Despite some who believe I should overdose on a lifetime supply of humble pie, I stand by my May 13 article wherein I claimed the coronavirus was being used by many to seize power. Merely observe those in power as they flaunt their own rules and change the threshold for restarting the economy.

Mayor does much to better Boulder City

Competent leadership of a family or another entity usually comes with weighty responsibilities and the absolute certainty that someone won’t be happy with some of the decisions made.

City needs new mayor now

There is an African proverb that translates to the familiar saying that it takes a village to raise a child. This literally means an entire community of people must interact with children for those children to experience and grow in a safe and healthy environment. What’s my point? Right now, city hall isn’t united and our village isn’t healthy.

Build bridges, not barriers

Books and movies are meant to entertain, and often educate us. In today’s world, as we spend more time at home, the need to be entertained and educated has never been greater.

Council acts follow city charter

The blaring headline, the denigrating letters to the editor, the smoke thrown into our already hazy skies. All these false efforts result in the editor of this newspaper calling for the end of chaos at City Hall. Dire statements are cast forward that any action by the current City Council to govern this city are not worth our while.

City wrong to mandate voluntary unit

City Council’s action Tuesday night to require the Boulder City Police Department to maintain a mounted unit is wrong.