weather icon Mostly Cloudy

Historical preservation requires teamwork

Last Wednesday night, the Boulder City Planning Commission ruled that it had acted properly in issuing a demolition permit for the old hospital on Park Place to developer Randy Schams.

The appeal filed by the Historic Boulder City Foundation was denied and, pending final approval from the City Council on Nov. 10, Schams will be free to demolish the historic building.

No matter how the board ruled, or how the city will vote in two weeks, it is a no win situation for practically everyone involved. The only possible person to benefit from the contentious situation is Schams himself, who will soon be free to develop the property.

The basic problem with the entire situation is that the old hospital building is private property.

Sure it is listed on the National Registry of Historic Places. But that designation doesn’t guarantee that it must be preserved. The registry only serves to state that the site has “significance to the history of their community, state, or the nation.”

According to the National Park Service, which oversees the registry, “a property owner can do whatever they want with their property as long as there are no federal monies attached to the property.”

If the federal government won’t step in to preserve a historic building, is it the city’s place?

Certainly asking the City Council to determine the fate of a piece of private property is a dilemma. While many would want the council members to step in and save the old hospital, would they feel the same way if they stopped them from doing something to their own homes? Would it be fair for the city to say you can’t tear down an old porch and replace it with a rose garden?

Then again, whose place is it to help preserve treasures such as the old hospital?

It is one of the first buildings Six Cos. erected when the city was created during the construction of Hoover Dam. In this case, it is significant to the town’s history and belongs on the national registry.

There also is a great deal of emotional attachment to the old hospital building. It’s where many of our town’s residents were born.

If the foundation did succeed in preventing demolition of the building, what would it accomplish? Unless the group has millions of dollars, it certainly couldn’t purchase the old hospital from Schams or restore it to its former glory.

Its idea to transform the building into a museum is nobel. Museums are a great asset to any community, and especially one so steeped in history.

But let us not forget that Boulder City already has a great museum. It also could use some of the support the foundation members are expending on an all-but-certain lost cause.

The time to act was months ago, long before the hospital fell into disrepair, and long before Schams purchased the property.

Although the foundation members are obviously unhappy with the ruling, their cause is not entirely for nothing. At the very minimum, they raised the community’s awareness about the plight of historic buildings in the city. It has and will continue to get people to think about how these city treasures should be treated and cared for.

It is already making a difference for another historic property in town: the Browder Building on Nevada Way in the downtown area.

I certainly don’t condone destroying historic buildings. Like many others, I have an affinity for old architecture and the stories behind them.

Perhaps instead of being adversaries, the city and foundation should find a way to work together and establish a good plan where guidelines and recommendations are established for dealing with historic properties. That way everyone wins.

Hali Bernstein Saylor is editor of the Boulder City Review. She can be reached at hsaylor@bouldercityreview.com or at 702-586-9523. Follow @HalisComment on Twitter.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
No parade passes us by

The start of a new year is always a big deal for me. But it’s not the fireworks or parties that I look forward to as one year melds into another.

Change marks past year

As I look back at the past 361 days, there is one thing throughout 2017 that has been constant: change.

‘Twas the baking before Christmas

Last year, many readers commented how much they enjoyed my column about holiday baking and requested that I make this an annual tradition. With apologies to Clement Clarke Moore, here it is:

Feminism dominates 2017

Earlier this week, Merriam-Webster, a leading authority on language, declared “feminism” as 2017’s word of the year.

Santa’s arrival heralds magical time

I have come to the conclusion that there truly is something magical about Santa’s red suit. It can turn back time.

Sample sights, sounds, tastes of holidays

Now that you have enjoyed your Thanksgiving dinner, shopped all the Black Friday, Small Business Saturday and Cyber Monday sales, and polished off the leftovers, it’s time to let the holiday celebration begin in earnest.

Reasons to be thankful plentiful

Since our paper comes out each Thursday and Thanksgiving falls on the fourth Thursday of the month, it seems natural to take this opportunity to give thanks for all the blessings that have come my way — and the way of this staff — over the past 365 days.

Time too precious to squander

It’s been said that time and tide wait for no man.

Time brings steps in right direction

It’s been said that time flies when you’re having fun. I’ve also heard that time passes much more quickly the older you get.