63°F
weather icon Clear

City needs infusion of new residents to thrive

In Boulder City, we take pride in our quaint, small-­town community. Most of us live here because we prefer to stay away from the crowds and traffic, treasure our intimate schools, and enjoy knowing and cultivating friendships with not just our neighbors but also local bank tellers, school custodians, firemen, plumbers, waitresses and virtually everyone else in town.

Boulder City’s land-­sale restrictions and slow-growth ordinances are a big reason why our community has been able to remain that way for many years. But sometimes even good things can have unintended consequences, especially when we fail to fully appreciate and properly respond to changing circumstances.

Unfortunately, there’s compelling evidence that our slow­-growth restrictions have transformed over time into rigid no-growth policies that are now rapidly, yet almost imperceptibly, moving us in the wrong direction, particularly in light of important changes looming on the horizon.

One of those consequences is the alarming downward trend in enrollment at our schools. Last year, both of our elementary schools were below 80 percent capacity, and our junior high and high schools barely topped 60 percent capacity. Those declining numbers, in turn, have negative implications for our children.

Dwindling enrollments mean fewer education dollars for Boulder City’s schools, fewer teachers, fewer counselors, less-competitive sports teams and smaller campuses for future generations.

For instance, because our high school’s enrollment will drop below 600 students this year, it has lost teachers again and has now been forced to downsize from two counselors to one. That translates into a student­-to-­counselor ratio of almost 600-to-1 rather than the much more manageable 300-to-1 we’re accustomed to. Our consistently high-­performing kids deserve much better than that.

A similarly dismaying, albeit subtle, transformation is the aging of Boulder City’s population. Senior citizens now comprise well over 40 percent of our citizenry, and that number is skyrocketing quickly toward 50 percent. Don’t get me wrong; we love our senior citizens. My parents are seniors, and it won’t be long before I’ll be one, too.

But as the young family base Boulder City once had has grown up and moved away, we haven’t done a very good job of replacing it. In fact, because of fictitious pressures that slow­-growth policies place on our real estate market and cheaper alternatives barely a stone’s throw away in Henderson, young families are finding it tougher than ever to locate affordable starter homes in Boulder City and far less attractive than ever to live here.

And then there’s Interstate 11. Ever since the I-­11 bypass was finally funded a few years ago, Boulder City’s workforce and business owners have increasingly expressed concerns about its potential impact on our economy. In response, there’s been an accompanying increase in focus by virtually everyone — those same business owners and employees, our Chamber of Commerce, the city and its Economic Vitality Commission, third­-party “expert” consultants, and other concerned citizens — on how we can better market our city to regional, national and even international tourists.

That’s all appropriate, I suppose. But what seems to have gotten lost in the shuffle is the most potent and relevant consumer group of all: our residents.

If we truly believe that Boulder City is in danger of becoming the next Radiator Springs, the surest way to make that a self-fulfilling prophecy is to become increasingly dependent on outsiders to fuel our economy. The better approach is to first and foremost shore up our local customer base with some much-­needed growth. And, yes, then supplement with a steady influx of tourists.

Given our stagnant population and the limited prospects of future growth, is it really all that surprising that grocery store chains aren’t exactly banging down our doors to take over the boarded­-up Haggen’s property? If I were in their shoes, I’d look at Boulder City’s limited growth patterns coupled with I-­11’s associated uncertainties and run away to take my chances elsewhere.

On the other hand, if there were 3,000­-5,000 more mouths to feed and patronize my business, I’d sure be much more inclined to give Boulder City a closer look.

Finally, let’s not ignore the impact that virtually static growth has on our city’s tax base. Not only does a flat­lining populace mean fewer overall tax dollars to fund aging infrastructure needs and the ever-increasing cost of providing services, it also means each individual’s tax burden is proportionately greater and likely destined to remain that way.

So if you’re one of those people like me who wants the city to keep searching for alternatives to rate hikes, perhaps we should start rethinking our growth policies.

I’m certainly not suggesting massive growth. But I am advocating moderate growth at a measured pace. A few thousand extra people over a dozen or so years would do wonders. Boulder City needs periodic transfusions of fresh blood.

All socially, intellectually, spiritually, culturally and economically thriving communities do. Otherwise, the unintended consequences of no growth will eventually overtake us, and we’ll only have ourselves to blame.

Rod Woodbury is mayor of Boulder City. He has been serving on the City Council since 2011 and is the president and managing shareholder of his law firm, Woodbury Law.

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
Appointment raises questions

Last week, City Council members terminated the employment contracts for City Manager Al Noyola and City Attorney Steve Morris.

Mail-in ballots problematic

If you don’t believe mail-in ballots are a problem, think again. My wife and I became permanent Boulder City residents when we moved from California five years ago. We own property here and have Nevada driver’s licenses. We have no connection to California whatsoever and haven’t for five years.

City must move forward in unity

What Boulder City needs right now is a giant bandage.

More than two parties needed to effect change

The first ballot I cast in a presidential election was in 1972 — Nixon versus McGovern. I also served as an election judge, which is what they were called in Illinois. In Nevada, the term is poll worker (also known as election board officer). Times were different then — no computers, no voting machines, only paper ballots in my precinct.

Importance of newspapers celebrated

Sunday marked the start of the 80th annual observance of National Newspaper Week.

Choice to make at poll obvious

To say I was taken aback by the first presidential debate would be a severe understatement. While all three debaters left much to be desired, I was stunned that pollster Frank Luntz, who watched with a cadre of unsure voters, tweeted, “This debate has actually convinced some undecided voters to not vote at all.”

Make your vote count

From the very beginning of our country, voting for those who will govern us has been an intrinsic principle.

Fight against virus must continue

As we enter into the fall season, the number of new COVID-19 infections and hospitalizations in Clark County has been decreasing gradually over the past few weeks. Gov. Steve Sisolak has issued new guidelines as a result that allow the few businesses still closed in Boulder City to reopen. The governor is closely following the advice from health experts when issuing the guidelines. Our city government is then following the guidelines to slow the spread of the virus.

What are you going to vote for?

I’m not asking “who” you are voting for. I’m asking “what” you voting for. When we cast our ballots this November, we won’t be casting our votes for an individual, even though it seems like it. We will be casting our votes for an ideal, a concept of democracy for our nation’s republic.

Congress has way to fix unemployment problems

Folks don’t like to face problems. They’re much easier to ignore. Everyone chooses. Face problems and find a solution or have them blow up in your face. Or, maybe you’ll get lucky and the problems vanish. Or, you carry them around and suffer the consequences day by day, usually for far too long.