100°F
weather icon Clear

Motion filed to dismiss protester’s obstruction charge

Counsel for a Boulder City resident charged by the city for interfering in a police-sanctioned crosswalk enforcement event has filed a motion to dismiss one of the charges on First Amendment grounds.

On Tuesday, attorney Stephen Stubbs filed a motion to dismiss the obstruction charge against his client, John Hunt, because the allegation of criminal activity “attempts to criminalize the simple act of ‘walking back and forth in a crosswalk being used for the enforcement activity.’”

Boulder City Police Sgt. John Glenn arrested Hunt on June 8, 2016, on several charges after he repeatedly walked back and forth in a marked crosswalk to protest a police-sanctioned pedestrian enforcement detail. Those charges included obstructing traffic and resisting arrest.

The city originally dropped the charges against Hunt in late June 2016 but refiled them June 5, 2017.

In his motion, Stubbs said that Hunt’s crosswalk protest was symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment and per state law “the obstruction charge cannot apply because the First Amendment applies.”

The motion also includes Hunt’s statement about the event in which he said he was not happy with his government’s actions and decided to exercise his First Amendment right to protest by legally crossing the street in a manner that gave proper notice to drivers.

Additionally, Hunt said only one car was making an attempt to pass him while he was in the crosswalk, and he paused to let the vehicle by.

“As soon as Sgt. Glenn showed interest in talking to me, I immediately stopped crossing the street, stood still on the sidewalk, and waited patiently for him to approach,” he said in his statement. “Instead of approaching and having a conversation with me, John Glenn grabbed me.”

The motion also includes depositions from two Nevada Highway Patrol officers.

Nevada Highway Patrol Trooper Marcia Pitchford said Hunt was in the crosswalk legally and thought Hunt was one of the operation’s decoys. She also said she pulled over a motorist that did not legally yield to him in the crosswalk.

Nevada Highway Patrol Sergeant Raymond Hubbs said Hunt was not violating the law when he stepped into the crosswalk and it “would not be probable cause for an arrest.”

Currently, a hearing to address this motion is scheduled for 3:30 p.m. Tuesday, Feb. 27, in Boulder City Municipal Court.

Contact reporter Celia Shortt Goodyear at cgoodyear@bouldercityreview.com or at 702-586-9401. Follow her on Twitter @csgoodyear.

MOST READ
LISTEN TO THE TOP FIVE HERE
THE LATEST
Council confusion: The leash law saga continues

Three statements — notably, none of them from members of the city council — best illustrated the difficulties residents (both dog-loving and not) have had for at least four years when it comes to the issue of off-leash dogs in public parks.

Breeding in BC? Probably not

Unlike the discussion later in the meeting Tuesday night in which the city council appeared determined to make sure no one was angry at them about the issue of off-leash dogs, they directed staff to take very strong action on the issue of pet breeding.

Lifejacket donations aim to save lives

Greg Bell’s memory lives on by way of a generous donation that may saves lives.

Huge crowd turns out to honor Patton

It was brought up during Saturday’s unveiling of the Shane Patton Memorial Monument as to why Shane’s statue stands 11 feet tall.

Disaster in China affects Damboree fireworks show

As the city prepares for Damboree, one of our biggest celebrations of the year, a tragedy in China is having an impact on the annual fireworks show.

City Celebrates First Responders

Photos courtesy City of Boulder City

Toll Brothers gets split decision

The development of the area near Boulder Creek Golf Course known as Tract 350 (the sale of which is slated to pay for the majority of the planned replacement for the aging municipal pool) may have hit a snag last week as the planning commission voted 5-1 to deny the developers’ request to build houses closer to the street than is allowed under current law.