80°F
weather icon Cloudy

Council OKs controverial zone change

Funeral homes and mortuaries are now allowed as a conditional use in the city’s C1 neighborhood commercial zone despite a divided vote by City Council and numerous residents voicing their opposition to the idea.

At Tuesday’s council meeting, more than 50 people provided comment, mostly opposing a text amendment to allow funeral homes and mortuaries in R1 single-family residential and C1 neighborhood commercial zones. Currently, they are allowed as a conditional use in C2 general commercial and CM commercial manufacturing zones.

Tyson Smith, owner of Boulder City Family Mortuary, applied for the change.

“All we’re trying to do is make it so we have more options out there,” he said.

Smith said his Boulder City and Henderson locations are at capacity and, if a property like a church, became available, he would like to be able to move forward with it.

Lost value, traffic

Those who were not in favor of the change expressed concern about their property losing value and the increased traffic a funeral home or mortuary could bring to a neighborhood.

“It would be irresponsible to not consider this impact on residents. … I respectfully submit that such a proposed business as a mortuary should be located in a pure commercial zone, and not be shoe-horned into a residential zone where many residents and citizens of Boulder City will be forced to take a significant financial hit,” wrote Jeff Johnson in his emailed comment.

Resident Bruce Smith said the “overall thing” with the amendment is “money” and his property value is going to go down if it’s passed.

“I’m going to lose value in my house for something I don’t want,” he said.

They also expressed concern about the possibility of a crematorium eventually being put in at the mortuary.

Smith said that “fear should be put to rest” because his crematorium is in Henderson and he isn’t planning on putting one in Boulder City.

“It’s not permitted,” he said. “The process to put one in (a) town is a nightmare.”

Necessary business

“It’s just a challenge to find anything that would be suitable,” Smith added. “What we do need is a chapel that would seat up to 125 people and we need offices inside of the funeral home. I’m looking for possibly three offices, four offices, (and) a couple of arrangement rooms to sit with families and make arrangements.”

Those who supported the amendment said they wanted to make sure Smith could keep his business in town.

“Funeral homes are supposed to be a part of the community, not on the outside,” Allen Calvert wrote in an email. “As anyone that would be interested in moving a funeral home into the area would still need to get approval even with the zoning amendment, I see no reason why this change is not appropriate as everything still has to be approved on a case by case basis.”

Others simply encouraged the council to do what was best for the community.

“I fully recognize the weight that’s on your shoulders as City Council, and I recognize that the decisions that you make, the policies that you set will define this community for generations to come. … I pray that you reflect and make the decision that is in the best interest of our community,” said Stephen Gay.

Zoning conditions

Councilman James Howard Adams asked Smith what about the C2 zone didn’t work for a mortuary.

Smith said the “spacing is too tight” and there is no building large enough with enough parking.

“It’s not about me,” he said. “It’s about the community … I love our community. I love my neighbors right here. … I promise if I was in someone’s backyard, I would be the best neighbor I could be.”

Since they are a conditional use, Smith, or anyone else, would have to go before the Planning Commission for approval to open a mortuary at a specific property.

During their discussion, the council members agreed they had to look at this request objectively and not personally.

“I do understand the need for a mortuary. … This is not about a specific business owner,” said Mayor Kiernan McManus. “It is the type of businesses that are to be allowed to operate in residential areas.”

“We have to look at it … objectively,” said Councilwoman Sherri Jorgensen. “Not as a person applying. Not as a place, but as what is being asked because what is being asked tonight is for a change in the R1 and C1 to include as a conditional use mortuaries.”

Jorgensen also said she believes mortuaries are an essential business.

“The thing that I know more than anything is, as sure as we are born, we will die, and that’s a fact,” she said. “And as we need people to be there for us when we are born to help us in that process, we need people to be there for us when we die.”

Limited opportunities

Jorgensen also said she wasn’t comfortable with mortuaries being allowed in the R1 zone, but she did think it could work in the C1 zone because they would have less of an impact than some of the currently permitted uses in that zone like grocery stores.

Councilman Matt Fox agreed and said it’s hard to find the right location in town for a business because there isn’t much available. He also said he’d be OK with a mortuary in the C1 zone.

Both McManus and Adams said they did not agree with the amendment because of the amount of public opposition to it.

“They have stated their fears and concerns over the financial impact it might have on their property values,” said Adams. “There are concerns about the quality of life they have come to expect in Boulder City.”

McManus said he thought this amendment did not promote the general welfare of the city because of the opposition to it and that it didn’t comport with the city’s comprehensive plan.

Jorgensen made the motion to approve the amendment but only allow mortuaries in the C1 zone. Council approved it in a 3-2 vote with McManus and Adams voting against it.

Contact reporter Celia Shortt Goodyear at cgoodyear@bouldercityreview.com or at 702-586-9401. Follow her on Twitter @csgoodyear.

THE LATEST
A primer on ‘public comment’ in council meetings

There have been a number of contentious issues to come before the city council in the past year. Short-term rentals, incorrect communication about the Republican caucus, pet breeding permits, off-highway vehicles on city streets.

Airport tower project takes a step forward

Plans to add a control tower to the Boulder City Municipal Airport took another step forward last week as the comment period for the draft environmental assessment prepared for the city and the Federal Aviation Administration came to an end on May 2.

Tedder looks back on tenure

Despite being in Boulder City less than three years, Taylour Tedder said he will always have a place in his heart for the town he served as city manager.

Lady Eagles dominant in playoff victories

Opening up regional play with a pair of routs, Boulder City High School softball looks primed for a state tournament appearance.

Spring Jamboree this weekend

It’s become one of the most popular annual events in Boulder City and this year is expected to be no different.

Off-road to go on-road?

“They didn’t want the apple, but do they want the orange?” asked Councilmember Sherri Jorgensen. “We’re still talking about fruit here.”

O’Shaughnessy records perfect ACT score

On Feb. 27, BCHS junior Sam O’Shaughnessy walked into the testing room to take the American College Test (better known as the ACT), hoping for a good score. Little did he know he’d walk out having done something just 3,000 students achieve each year – perfection.

Staff advises adding new full-time employees

The Boulder City governmental budget moved a couple of steps closer to its legally-mandated approval at the end of May as the city council heard revised revenue estimates and got requested additional information on a total of eight proposed new positions within the city.

What’s your sign?

In their 1971 hit entitled “Signs”, the 5 Man Electrical Band sang, “Sign, sign, everywhere a sign. Blockin’ out the scenery, breakin’ my mind. Do this, don’t do that, can’t you read the sign?”