83°F
weather icon Cloudy

Commission denies appeal of hospital demolition

The old Boulder City Hospital on Park Place is one step closer to being demolished.

On Oct. 21, the Planning Commission rejected the appeal, 4-1, from the Historic Boulder City Foundation that property owner Randy Schams' permit was obtained incorrectly.

Commission member Schams and chairman Jim Giannosa did not vote because of personal interests in the matter.

The opinion of the commission now goes to City Council, which will make a final decision on the permit during its meeting Nov. 10.

Attorney John Hawley, representing the foundation, argued that the city didn't meet five criteria required by a zoning ordinance for the permit application process to be considered legal. The city then has as many as 45 days to complete the process, which Boulder City completed in 21 days.

"The hearing (for Schams' demolition permit) was held almost a month prior to the hospital actually being sold," Hawley said. "What they did wrong with this procedure in the first place was having a hearing on a property that wasn't owned by the person who requested the hearing."

According to community development director Brok Armantrout, a permit may be obtained by a future owner with the current owner's approval, which Schams had.

The foundation's attorney also said the city needed to provide a written and photographic history of the building. Although the city provided the written history, it had citizens take and send in photos of the old hospital.

Armantrout said that citizens offering help to the city is legal, saying it's "not in the code and not required" for the city to provide the history itself.

"We were perfectly willing and able to do it ourselves," Armantrout said. "They were wanting to participate so they were allowed to assist."

Another major reason why an appeal was filed against Schams' demolition permit was naturally occurring asbestos.

The naturally occurring asbestos that would arise from the building as it fell would be harmful to all residents of Boulder City, not just the ones nearby, according to Hawley.

Armantrout said there are safety measures that will mitigate the amount of asbestos that would come from the building and site.

The city encouraged Schams in person and through a letter not to tear down the building, according to Armantrout, and made Schams aware of possible economic incentives he could get for leaving the building intact.

On the contrary, Hawley and the foundation say that the city didn't try hard enough, as was evident when the city finished the permit process with 24 days remaining until deadline.

Both sides agreed that zoning ordinance 11-27-6 was rather vague in its attempt to dissect what must happen for a historic building to be demolished, and said the code should be looked at in the future.

After formal arguments concluded, members of the public were allowed to comment.

Most of those attending the meeting were outraged, going after the city publicly and personally when taking the stand.

After 45 minutes of public comment, the board made its decision, and Schams was granted the demolition permit.

Commission members Fritz McDonald, Cokie Booth, Glen Leavitt and Paul Matsuka approved the permit while member John Redlinger voted against it.

— Contact reporter Randy Faehnrich at rfaehnrich@bouldercityreview.com or at 702-586-9401. Follow him on Twitter @RandyFaehnrich

MOST READ
LISTEN TO THE TOP FIVE HERE
THE LATEST
Really better buy that helmet

With a couple of significant amendments, the city council voted unanimously to pass an ordinance regulating the use of e-bikes and e-scooters in Boulder City. The ordinance passed unanimously Tuesday and will take effect on Sept. 18.

Nevada Way to go Pink … and pay for the privilege

The main topic of discussion was color. As in color of a building when the board of the Boulder City Redevelopment Agency (aka the city council) met two weeks ago.

City to nix admin services dept. in favor of deputy city manager

In a move that is really little more than “cleanup” (i.e., bringing official city code into sync with decisions made by the city council more than a year ago), the council voted to approve changes to city code related to the created-but-not-yet-filled position of deputy city manager.

Better buy a helmet …

It was just the opening salvo, but it appears that lost patience with riders of e-bikes and scooters are to the point that they are ready to go well beyond the “Well, how about more education” approach they opted for back in April.

Boulder City approves fire captains’ 2-year contract

For those who may have seen any of the recent social media posts put out by reps of the firefighters union calling out the city about pay and benefits, they might have been surprised that one collective bargaining agreement covering fire department personnel was approved by the city council this week without any discussion at all.

What’s on the pole?

There are 1,450 power poles in Boulder City and 880 of them support equipment owned by private companies who don’t pay for the privilege.

Shooting gets another look

It’s a case that captured the attention of many in Boulder City more than four years ago and has kept that attention ever since.

Advocate for preservation?

It is not often in Boulder City that there is resident pressure for the city to create a new position and hire someone to fill it. But that is the situation discussed recently by the Historic Preservation Commission.