49°F
weather icon Mostly Clear

City addresses future needs in budget talks

City Council members on March 16 met with heads of departments and Boulder City’s finance director to discuss the budget for fiscal year 2017.

The first topic was the possibility of the city paying for a Safekey scholarship that helps children who can’t afford the after-school program. Constituents were concerned that children from low-income families wouldn’t have access to the program because the Gaal Group, which operates under the Dan Leach Memorial Fund, isn’t hosting its “Puttin’ Fore the Kids” golf tournament this year and may not donate to the scholarship fund next year.

Council members Duncan McCoy and Peggy Leavitt agreed the council should come up with the $25,000 to $27,000 that the Gaal Group usually provides to ensure all children have a chance to benefit from the program.

Councilman Cam Walker commented that he would like to see specific item lines on the budget updated to reflect actual spending from years past. While City Finance Director Shirley Hughes said she and City Manager David Fraser had worked to reconcile a good portion of the items, some had not been adjusted and showed departments consistently spending less than what they were budgeted over several years.

Mayor Rod Woodbury said he’d like the budget process to start earlier in the future so that council members will have more time to meet with department directors and discuss what projects and expenses take priority.

Hughes said the earlier the process begins, the more “iffy” annual revenue estimates will be.

The budget forecasts $2.4 million to be taken from the city’s general fund and put toward various capital projects in fiscal year 2017. From the utility fund Hughes budgeted $340,000 for vehicle purchases, $500,000 for miscellaneous projects and $250,000 for the city’s landfill expansion.

Among other items discussed at the meeting were a $20,000 lawn mower for the public works department, new software for emergency medical crews at the fire department and the expansion of the Boulder City Municipal Court building to include meeting space for attorneys and clients and a bigger entry way for better security.

The council spent about 1½ hours discussing the general fund portion of the 2017 budget, which Hughes says is about the same as it is every year. Another 40 minutes were dedicated to talking about the utility fund and the potential for raising rates for utility consumers.

Walker asked Hughes and fellow council members whether raising rates for utility customers was necessary because the budget reflected about $2.37 million in depreciation of airport, cemetery and utility systems, which he argued should be addressed in financial statements and not the budget.

“We have to acknowledge depreciation but we don’t have to put money in the bank for it,” Walker said Tuesday. “We have to spend what’s necessary to improve the system.”

He said depreciation costs should be reflected in year-end financial reports rather than in the city’s forecast revenues and expenses for the next fiscal year.

Hughes disagreed, saying, “It is an expense and it does affect the city’s bottom line.”

Hughes also said that while the council doesn’t have to determine the specifics of a new rate structure or when its rollout would be by the next budget meeting, it needs to decide whether utility rate hikes will be part of the 2017 budget before the final version is due at the end of May.

Woodbury said he learned a lot in a face-to-face meeting with Fraser and Hughes and recommended other council members reach out to them on an individual basis to get their questions answered before the next budget talk.

The council will discuss the budget again at its regular April 12 meeting. Hughes said the city needs to send a tentative budget to the Department of Taxation by April 15 and the final budget needs to be approved by May 31.

Contact Kimber Laux at klaux@bouldercityreview.com or 702-586-9401. Find her on Twitter: @lauxkimber

MOST READ
LISTEN TO THE TOP FIVE HERE
THE LATEST
Leash law is in effect

After an almost four-year saga, the part of Boulder City code that allowed dog owners to have their dogs off-leash in public as long as they were under verbal control practically (though not officially) goes away as of Dec. 4.

Historic designation sought for hangar

Getting the old Bullock Field Navy Hangar onto the National Registry of Historic Places has been on the radar of the Boulder City Historic Preservation Commission for about a year and a half and earlier this month, the city council agreed.

Council votes to reverse decision on historic home

Earlier this year, the city council voted to reverse a planning commission decision. It was not of note because no one in the ranks of city staff could remember such a reversal ever having happened in the time they worked for the city.

BC mounted unit gets put out to pasture

It was a concept 57 years in the making that lasted eight years when it finally came to fruition.

Breeding issue tabled …again

It is a can that has been kicked down the road for almost three years – or more like 14 years, depending on how you count. And it got kicked down the road again last week as the city council failed to come to a consensus on the issue of pet breeding in Boulder City.

Put that dog on a leash BC tightens “at-large” law

The most important part of what happens in a city council meeting is not always the vote. Sometimes it is something that seems minor at the time. This week, as the council finally voted unanimously to tighten up Boulder City’s notoriously lax leash law, the important part came long before any discussion about the actual law.

Hardy feted by League of Cities

Anyone who has been around the Boulder City political world for any stretch of time already knows that Mayor Joe Hardy is a pretty humble guy and not one to toot his own horn.

Utility director Stubitz takes new job with state

When Utilities Director Joe Stubitz briefed the city council on the status of Boulder City’s Dark Sky initiative, which involves replacing hundreds of street light fixtures with modern versions that aim light onto the ground and not into the sky, it was notable for reasons beyond spending and how soon the program would be finished.