83°F
weather icon Clear

Boulder City approves $1.7M settlement for two former city executives

The City Council approved a settlement of $1.7 million for two former city executives on Tuesday, ending one of the more contentious periods in recent Boulder City history.

That period seemed for many city residents to be all fireworks, all the time, and it ended with a bang as the City Council approved a settlement with former city attorney Steve Morris and former city manager Al Noyola.

“The settlement agreements put before this open meeting by the City Council resolve several claims against the city,” said Mayor Joe Hardy. “These claims were pending a decision by the state’s Supreme Court, likewise, claims for breach of employment contracts and wrongful termination were pending against the city in the Eighth Judicial District Court. These claims are now fully resolved with the action taken on April 25, 2023.”

“Any and all claims that were alleged or could be alleged by the parties are also resolved. The decision resulted from confidential litigation settlement protocols as allowed in Nevada statutes.

“Claims by affected parties are hereby resolved. No further litigation is required allowing for the satisfaction of all sides without further risk or adverse judgments. I believe that it is in the best interest of all parties involved to put this behind us.”

Ending the conflict was not cheap. Between the amounts being paid to the two former city executives and the amount spent on outside legal counsel, the total is more than $2 million.

Morris will receive $995,000. Noyola will receive $715,000. Law firm Bailey Kennedy has been paid $338,695. Grand total: $2,048,695.

Morris and Noyola were both terminated by the City Council in a meeting on Oct. 13, 2020. The termination was characterized as being “for cause” with most then-members of the council questioning their professionalism amid tensions about issues involving fuel at the Boulder City Airport — which some members of the council said represented the pair overstepping their authority — as well as disputes about advice regarding open meeting laws.

Neither of the former executives were given severance pay. According to the terms of their employment agreements, Morris was due $259,458.15 and Noyola’s contract called for severance of $234,613.97.

A lawsuit was filed almost immediately after the termination, with Morris and Noyola claiming that their firings were in retaliation for them testifying against former mayor Kiernan McManus during an internal investigation regarding accusations of harassment, retaliation, creating and fostering a hostile work environment and discrimination. Additionally, they claimed they were the subjects of harassment and discrimination, and that their employment contracts were breached when they were fired.

The lawsuit was withdrawn in November 2020 when the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission deemed that potential “administrative remedies” to a lawsuit had not yet been exhausted. In June of 2021, the city offered to settle the case for more than the contracted severance — $270,000 to Morris and $290,000 to Noyola — but far less than the amount sought in the lawsuit which Morris reported to be “in excess of $2.5 million.” That offer expired without a response from Morris or Noyola.

Morris has alleged that a settlement conference scheduled for Sept. 10, 2021 was unilaterally canceled by McManus without knowledge or input from three council members (Matt Fox, Sherri Jorgensen and former member Claudia Bridges).

A year later, in September 2022, the EEOC found that administrative remedies had been exhausted and issued a “right to sue” notice, allowing the discrimination claims to move forward. A new lawsuit was filed in December of last year and, at that time, current City Attorney Brittany Walker alluded to the possibility of a settlement saying, “Since Mr. Morris has now received the right-to-sue notice he is re-alleging these claims. The city is hopeful to have these matters resolved in the near future.” A 60-day stay was issued on Feb. 15 in order to give the parties time to negotiate a settlement with both sides reporting that an agreement in principle had been reached.

According to a staff report, the city’s insurer has received a claim for the amount of the settlement, not the legal fees. If the insurer denies the claim, then the settlement would come from an existing Risk Management Fund. Per the report, the fund has enough in it to cover the settlement should the claim be denied.

Between in-person, email and phone calls, 10 Boulder City residents commented with all but one focusing on the settlement. Former mayor Kiernan McManus came to to podium and said, “We live in odd times, when facts are no longer facts.” He claimed that the employment contracts between the city and both Morris and Noyola defied the city charter (without saying how or why) and claiming that the city’s insurer had told him that they would deny the pending claim. This allegation was not able to be verified by press time.

A number of comments alluded to —and in one case flat-out stated —that three members of the council should recuse themselves due to an outside relationship with Morris in which the former city attorney is “superior.” These statements are based on the fact that Morris serves as the president of the Henderson Eldorado Stake of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and that those council members are part of that stake, making Morris an ecclesiastical leader to members of the council.

Steve Walton, who serves as a member of the presidency of that stake along with Morris sought advice from current City Attorney Brittany Walker about any need for recusal and was advised that there was no legal need for recusal. He read the following statement during the meeting.

“Regarding Item 6 on the consent agenda, I would like to disclose pursuant to NRS 281A that I served as interim fire chief as an independent contractor hired through a third-party firm called Management Partners while Al Noyola was city manager,” Walton said. “I have been advised by the city attorney that this former relationship is not a conflict of interest pursuant to NRS Chapter 281A as the relationship has concluded.”

Walton continued, saying, “I would also like to disclose that I serve as a counselor in the Henderson Eldorado Stake presidency within the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints along with Steve Morris, who is stake president. The city attorney researched this relationship and concluded that any commitment in a private capacity arising from this role is to the LDS Church, not Mr. Morris.

“Therefore, I have no conflict of interest in either of these matters and am able to fully participate and vote on these resolutions.”

Last month, the city agreed to a $165,000 settlement with former city clerk Lorene Krumm (who was terminated around the same time) instead of entering into a lawsuit.

THE LATEST
Council head fakes on pet breeding vote

It may seem to some as ironic that, at the same meeting where the lead animal control officer for the city spoke passionately about animals being abandoned by their owners in the desert around Boulder City and in which the council made clear that they expect city staff to return with a proposal for mandating microchipping of pets, that the city council considered a bill to amend city code to allow for pet breeding and fostering of up to eight dogs on a property within city limits.

Council mulls 2025 fiscal year budget

At a special meeting of the City Council on March 31,ith councilmember Matt Fox absent, the other four members of the council heard an overview of expected revenue and expenses for the 2025 fiscal year, which starts on July 1.

To chip or not to chip?

In its second time at the plate, as it were, the proposal by Boulder City Councilmember Cokie Booth to require that pets within BC be microchipped ended up with a lot of people talking about maybe taking a swing at the ball but no one actually doing so.

Council candidate slate set

A total of seven candidates for city council and three candidates for justice of the peace of Boulder Township will face off in the primary election scheduled for June 11.

Council gets crash course in road repairs

No, this does not mean that every street in Boulder City is about to get rebuilt.

Race for council to begin

Call the recent Presidential Preference Primary and the Republican Caucus the amuse-bouche of the 2024 election year — interesting and entertaining but essentially meaningless and not really part of the actual meal.

City announces new Parks and Recreation director

Boulder City staff embarked on a nationwide recruitment process for the parks and recreation director position. After sorting through several dozen applicants and an extensive interview process, the city found the right person was already here: Julie Calloway was promoted from parks and recreation manager to director this week.