95°F
weather icon Clear

What’s on the pole?

There are 1,450 power poles in Boulder City and 880 of them support equipment owned by private companies who don’t pay for the privilege.

That may be ending soon as the city council recently took the first step toward instituting franchise agreements with companies who use city infrastructure to provide private services.

In their single meeting in July, the council voted to accept a business impact study that is the first step in starting to charge franchise fees.

Currently, any public utility operating within the city pays a fee of 5% of their total revenue that comes from providing public services and they also have to obtain a license. According to a city report, this change would better align Boulder City with other jurisdiction in Southern Nevada.

According to Utilities Director Joe Stubitz, a bill formalizing the changes is slated to be introduced in the Sept. 9 meeting of the city council and voted on in the meeting scheduled for Sept. 23.

Under the proposed changes, companies that use city-owned utility poles will be subject to a one-time franchise fee of $500. In addition, there would be an annual fee of $100 per location as well as a separate annual fee of $1-per-linear-foot for the use of any city-owned cable or conduit. Per Stubitz, no companies are currently using city-owned conduit.

At $100 per location and 880 poles supporting private-company equipment, that is a potential windfall of $88,000 per year. And, unlike funds collected by the city-owned utility for services, which go into an enterprise fund, that can only be used for utility projects and operations, the franchise fees would go into the city’s general fund.

Much of the equipment mounted on city poles, according to Stubitz, is classified under the heading of “telecommunications.” In practice, that generally means internet service providers. Under state law, the city is not allowed to charge a franchise fee to providers of “video services” such as cable TV.

All of that results in a somewhat confusing situation. For example, Cox Communications is a major supplier of internet services in Boulder City, including to many businesses and households who do not have cable TV service. However, Cox is considered primarily a cable TV provider and, as such, has a franchise agreement with the state and is outside of local efforts like this one to charge for use of public infrastructure.

The entire exercise is an effort to, “modernize and clarify regulations governing the use of its infrastructure by private utility providers.” Specific changes would include amending Title 4, Chapter 12 of the Boulder City Municipal Code to require that all private public utility providers enter into a franchise agreement prior to installing facilities on city-owned poles or within underground infrastructure. This authority is granted to the city under Section 130 of the Boulder City Charter, which allows for the issuance of franchises to private corporations for the use of public streets and spaces in providing utility services.

MOST READ
LISTEN TO THE TOP FIVE HERE
THE LATEST
Better buy a helmet …

It was just the opening salvo, but it appears that lost patience with riders of e-bikes and scooters are to the point that they are ready to go well beyond the “Well, how about more education” approach they opted for back in April.

Boulder City approves fire captains’ 2-year contract

For those who may have seen any of the recent social media posts put out by reps of the firefighters union calling out the city about pay and benefits, they might have been surprised that one collective bargaining agreement covering fire department personnel was approved by the city council this week without any discussion at all.

Shooting gets another look

It’s a case that captured the attention of many in Boulder City more than four years ago and has kept that attention ever since.

Advocate for preservation?

It is not often in Boulder City that there is resident pressure for the city to create a new position and hire someone to fill it. But that is the situation discussed recently by the Historic Preservation Commission.

‘Investment in the well-being of our entire community’

Time was, unless you were a private pilot or lived on the far south side of town, you might not be aware at all of Boulder City’s small municipal airport.

Rewrite for solar lease gets council’s OK

Sometimes the most consequential long-term issues come and go in city council meetings with little or no discussion.

Suit filed over camping ban

Back in late May of this year, when the city council met and the proposed ordinance outlawing camping in public places in Boulder City was on the agenda, a small group of citizens showed up to decry the move in public comment.

Boulder City hires new fire chief

Following a nationwide search, Kenneth Morgan has been hired as the new fire chief for Boulder City. He starts work on Aug. 4.

What a difference six inches makes?

Within the past two months, the Boulder City Planning Commission denied a request by Toll Brothers, the anticipated developers of the area adjacent to Boulder Creek Golf Course known as Tract 350, to build homes that are closer to the street than the city’s current legal requirement of 20 feet.

City reallocates $750,000 for fiscal year 2025

More than a year ago, in a Boulder City Council discussion about budgeting, Mayor Joe Hardy, in two sentences, summed up the most basic truth about city budgets.