97°F
weather icon Windy

City plans changes to various fees to recoup costs

The Boulder City Public Works Department is proposing a number of changes to utility fees regarding water, sewer, electric and the Boulder City Municipal Cemetery.

The fees were proposed at a public workshop Oct. 26, which residents did not attend.

The proposed fees mostly affect business owners and home builders. For example, the city wants to lower the fee for basic installation and connection of electric services, meaning that development companies as well as residents building their own homes will see a decrease in fees that range from $2,500 to $7,500 depending on the size of the building project.

However, subsidies currently given for connection fees will be discontinued since the city is lowering the price.

Developers in Boulder City will have to deal with a higher fee regarding traffic studies for new building projects. The developer will now be on the hook for the city’s cost to hire a consultant as well as an extra 10 percent fee.

Currently, the city has a flat fee for traffic studies ranging from $700 to $5,000 dollars depending on the time needed for the study.

Public Works Director Scott Hansen said the proposed fees are necessary for the city to break even on costs.

“We just want to change some of the fees so we can break even,” Hansen said. “We are not trying to make money off these proposals, which is why we raised the cost of some fees and lowered the cost of some other fees.”

Changes also are proposed for the Boulder City Municipal Cemetery. Buying a plot of land is now $3,600 for residents and nonresidents; however, burials will now be free if the deceased’s last known address was in Boulder City. Nonresidents will have to pay $700 for a burial and $600 for cremation.

Hansen said changes in costs for the cemetery were necessary because it was losing too much money.

“We had to make some changes to our cemetery fees because we were losing $47,000 a year,”

Hansen said. “We scratched the burial fees for our residents but made the cost of the lot the same for everyone because residents have been selling their lots to nonresidents at a cheaper cost.”

The fees would go into effect Jan. 1, pending City Council approval Dec.13. Members of the public can address their concerns or approval of the proposed rates during the council meeting.

Contact reporter Max Lancaster at mlancaster@bouldercityreview.com or at 702-586-9401. Follow him on Twitter @MLancasterBCR.

MOST READ
LISTEN TO THE TOP FIVE HERE
THE LATEST
Hittin’ the town

Photos by Ron Eland/Boulder City Review

City reallocates $750,000 for fiscal year 2025

More than a year ago, in a Boulder City Council discussion about budgeting, Mayor Joe Hardy, in two sentences, summed up the most basic truth about city budgets.

Update on city utility projects

Sometimes the good information comes from unexpected places.

Third extension for portico funding

About once a month, before the start of the city council meeting, the members of the council meet wearing their hats as the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) and dole out money to reimburse businesses and homeowners in the historic district for qualifying work done to their properties.

Public weighs in on purchase

With last week’s announcement in the Boulder City Review that three longtime residents/businessmen purchased the former Central Market building and their plans to bring in a small grocery chain, there’s been plenty of input from the public.

Trio looks to bring new grocery store to town

If one were to ask 25 Boulder City residents what the town is missing, you’d probably get a few different answers like affordable housing or a movie theater. But the overwhelming answer would likely be the same – a second grocery store.

City awards $1.6M for pool design

Back in March 2024, Councilwoman Sherri Jorgensen said, “I can’t even imagine what it would cost in 2028.”

City transfers bond capacity

Kevin Hickey, of the Nevada Rural Housing Authority, has been making pretty much the same presentation to the council annually thanking the city for transferring nearly $1 million in bond capacity to the group he represents.

Council confusion: The leash law saga continues

Three statements — notably, none of them from members of the city council — best illustrated the difficulties residents (both dog-loving and not) have had for at least four years when it comes to the issue of off-leash dogs in public parks.