101°F
weather icon Clear

Nonfunctional turf to be cut

Yes, the word “green” is right there in the motto of Boulder City. But, due to changes in state law, some public spaces around town will soon sport desert landscaping rather than turf that needs to be irrigated.

In a presentation to the council, Utilities Director Joseph Stubitz noted that, in addition to bringing Boulder City into compliance with AB356, the removal would save approximately 50 million gallons of water each year.

“While we have had a wet year so far with rain totals at about 130 percent of average, we have been told that it would take several years with this kind of rainfall to make up for the current conditions at Lake Mead,” Stubitz said.

In 2021, the Nevada Legislature passed AB356, which was later signed by then-governor Steve Sisolak. The law mandates that all nonfunctional turf in Southern Nevada has to be removed no later than the end of 2026. Starting in 2027, it will be illegal to use Colorado River water to irrigate grass designated as nonfunctional.

The definition of nonfunctional refers largely to grass lining streets and sidewalks and decorative turf around buildings that are not designated as single-family homes.

Most of the turf that has to be removed in Boulder City is deemed non-functional due to setback and drainage issues.

In order to be considered functional, regardless of use, irrigated grass has to be located at least 10 feet away from a street and at a slope of less than 25 percent.

This 10-foot setback requirement is what is driving the removal of grass along the street at several parks, including Bicentennial Park, Frank Crowe Park, and Oasis Park.

Other areas such as the area between the Aquatic Center and the tennis courts at that combined facility are slated for removal due to size or usage restrictions.

Plans for removal will result in some areas being replaced with desert landscaping and some installation of artificial turf.

The agreement approved unanimously on Tuesday will result in the city receiving up to $1.7 million in rebates from the Southern Nevada Water Authority.

In Other Actions:

▶ Voted: To accept changes to the budget for the coming year to raise the hourly rate paid to part-time city workers to at least $12 per hour. The council had asked in a meeting last month for staff to explore changing the minimum to $15 per hour in order to better compete with local businesses for labor. While no figures were discussed at the meeting, staff did note that going all the way to $15 per hour would be very expensive and that the $12 per hour is a minimum but that ranges had been adjusted so that some employees could receive the higher figure.

▶ Directed: City staff to begin the process of appraising a plot of land adjacent to the airport. The appraisal is the first step in the process of possibly developing that 25-acre plot for additional aviation usage.

▶ Approved: $1.2 million for the construction of a training tower to be used by the fire department.

▶ Voted: To extend leases on 25 hangers located at the Boulder City Airport for a period of six months. The time extension is intended to give council time to review options for expiring leases including pricing and determine a solution for the future.

Contact reporter Bill Evans at wevans@bouldercityreview.com or at 702-586-9401.

MOST READ
THE LATEST
Yes to big garage, booze in the park

Not every story of public importance concerning city government comes out of decisions by the city council. Sometimes items of interest come out of those other city meetings that garner little attention.

BCPD makes pitch for new HQ

During Tuesday’s Boulder City Council meeting, BCPD Deputy Chief Aaron Johnson shared a very eye-opening photo.

Council hears update on pool project

Boulder City Parks and Recreation Director Julie Calloway presented the Boulder City Council Tuesday with an update on the proposed replacement for the city pool, as well as a lengthy justification of the anticipated cost.

Written comments will no longer be read into record at council meetings

In the journalism world, it’s called “burying the lede.” It means that the really important info is not at the top of the story. And it is an apropos comparison for a discussion about, well, public discussion.

Patton memorial approved 5-0 (or was it 3-2?)

In a vote that seemed to pit the competing values of going along to get along versus the freedom to dissent from the majority view, the city council went with unity and voted unanimously to allow construction of a memorial to fallen Boulder City veteran Shane Patton to happen in Wilbur Square rather than in Veterans’ Memorial Park where all other military memorials in the city are located.

Council votes to ‘move around’ ARPA funds

Very early in the current presidential administration, a huge spending bill was passed called the American Recovery Plan Act that was sold as being needed to prop up local governments because their tax revenue was expected to drop precipitously in the wake of the Covid pandemic.

Council votes unanimously to remove fence

Getting a permit for something like a fence in your front yard may seem like a contrivance. Intrusive government and all that. But, here’s the deal, deciding to bypass that step may end up meaning you have to tear that fence out at your own expense.

Poll: Public strongly backs tougher leash law

When the Review decided to put a question about leash laws on social media and to solicit comments, the level of response was a bit overwhelming. The question elicited nearly 100 comments and the ratio was more than 10-1 in favor of enacting a stricter leash law.

Utilities director outlines state of compliance

In scheduling that some might call ironic, immediately after approving a plan that would see the Municipal Golf Course continue to use 20% more water than allowed by law, the city council heard a presentation from Utilities Director Joseph Stubitz in which he outlined just how serious the drought is and how the city is working to comply with state law by removing turf from city parks and from areas surrounding city buildings.

Can that guy park in front of my house all day?

So, you have a great little house in or near the historic district and, to your annoyance, between events and employees for various local businesses, there are cars parked in front of your house pretty much every day.