54°F
weather icon Partly Cloudy

City ordered to pay residents’ attorney fees

Boulder City must pay approximately $180,000 to six residents by July 5 after the Nevada Supreme Court ruled that the city wrongly sued them after the residents circulated ballot initiative petitions in 2010.

The $180,000 will cover attorney fees and the cost of the lawsuit, said former Boulder City Councilwoman Linda Strickland, who represented the six residents in the case along with her husband, Tracy.

“I think it played out the only logical way it could’ve played out,” she said on the ruling. “These people had their First Amendment rights violated.”

The city sued Daniel Jensen, Walt Rapp, Frank Fisher, Cynthia Harris, Nancy Nolette and James Douglass after they drafted, circulated and submitted initiative petitions to place questions on the November 2010 ballot.

The city sued to challenge the legality of three initiatives, which limited city debt, established term limits for volunteer committees and prevented the city from owning more than one golf course. City staff believed the initiatives overstepped the city’s administrative authority and that naming the petitioners in a lawsuit was the only way to have a court examined the initiatives.

The city filed three separate lawsuits in three different courtrooms against the residents.

The petitioners, however, argued in District Court that the city’s lawsuits were strategic lawsuits against public participation, filed in an effort to silence them.

“Our cities generally bend over backward to protect our First Amendment rights, but Boulder City is an exception,” Strickland said.

The city, represented by law firm Lionel Sawyer &Collins, successfully argued at the District Court level in Clark County that it had the right to sue the petitioners to challenge the initiatives.

The Supreme Court overturned the rulings of three District Court judges, ruling that the city’s lawsuits were SLAPPs and the city could have challenged the initiatives by naming the secretary of state or another government entity as a defendant.

The defendants’ case was aided by the state Legislature amending Nevada’s anti-SLAPP statute in 2013, providing clarity about defendants’ immunity from civil actions.

Each of the three District Courts originally denied the special motions to dismiss under various grounds, but Judge Susan Scann sanctioned the city for the lawsuits.

On June 5, Judge Allen Earl signed the order that forces the city to pay the $180,000 no later than July 5.

City Attorney Dave Olsen said the city plans to file a motion for reconsideration of paying attorney fees. He said he knows the city will have to pay attorney fees, but believes the court is charging more than what is due.

Despite the winning outcome for her clients, Strickland said the entire process insinuates a growing problem that Boulder City’s elected officials don’t want public participation in local government.

“They say they invite participation, but when people apply in the form of citizen initiation they (the people) get sued,” she said. “They (Boulder City elected officials) feel our government should be a republic, not a democracy. Participation in Boulder City has come to a halt, and it has a chilling effect because of what happens when you sue citizens for participating in the democratic process.”

Olsen disagreed, saying that the city did nothing to prevent the residents from circulating petitions or collecting signatures for them. The items even reached the ballot, he added, and noted that the city filed the lawsuits after the election.

“The debt limitation initiative is now law in Boulder City, and the term limits for volunteers is now law within Boulder City,” Olsen said. “What did we do to interfere?”

Olsen said Strickland’s claim that Boulder City discourages public participation was a very emotional argument.

“I don’t get that at all,” he said. “The voters got their chance to vote, and everybody got their right to petition government. They (the residents) did everything they did without any interference from the city.”

Don't miss the big stories. Like us on Facebook.
THE LATEST
Councilman to be remembered at reception

Members of the community are invited to share their memories of the late Councilman Warren Harhay during an informal reception his family is hosting Sunday, Dec. 8, afternoon.

Planners recommend parcel for renewable energy

The Planning Commission is recommending a 1,275-acre parcel be added to the city’s land management process list for renewable energy generation.

Hoskins named to council

Judith Hoskins was selected as Boulder City’s newest council member during an hourlong special meeting Monday evening.

Council seat to be filled Monday

A replacement to the City Council seat vacated by the death of Councilman Warren Harhay will be appointed at a special meeting at 5 p.m. Monday, Nov. 18, in City Hall.

City boosts historic preservation

To help the city meet its historic preservation goals, City Council approved adding almost $60,000 to this fiscal year’s budget to hire a consultant during its meeting Tuesday, Nov. 12.

Plan proposes to expand dog park

City staff is proposing the dog park inside Veterans’ Memorial Park be expanded, rather than installing new multipurpose fields at the facility.

City’s power supply gets boost

Upgrades to Boulder City’s electrical system have begun as installation of the new backup power supply is scheduled to start next week and new power transmission lines are being put in.

City seeks to refinance debt

The city could save several million dollars if the City Council approves an agreement to refinance its debt.

 
Councilman Harhay dies

Councilman Warren Harhay died Tuesday night after a lengthy illness. He was 76.

Gingerwood gets OK to expand

Gingerwood Mobile Home Park will be growing as City Council approved rezoning part of the property to allow for more residential plots.