84°F
weather icon Clear

Candidates make final push

The three candidates running for City Council made one final push for votes as they shared their thoughts about several issues Tuesday evening inside the Elaine K. Smith Center.

About 50 people watched and listened as Rich Shuman, Peggy Leavitt and Linda Graham gave their input on myriad subjects, including Interstate 11, naturally occurring asbestos, the growth of Boulder City, and this year’s ballot question among others.

About half of the questions were submitted ahead of time so candidates could do research before the event, while the rest were asked on the fly. The event was sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce.

There was not much dissent among the candidates as all three shared opinions on a majority of the issues. All were in favor of ballot question No. 1, which asks the voters if the city can spend up to $1 million per year indefinitely from the capital improvement fund to repair city facilities.

Leavitt equated the capital improvement fund to making repairs on your home.

“I think it’s important for the voters to know that the capital improvement fund, by definition, can be used only for capital improvements,” she said.

Rich Shuman echoed the sentiment.

“The electrical system and the water system have been deteriorating over time. Over the last six years or so, we haven’t had the funds to make those necessary repairs,” he said.

Candidates also were asked about the city’s budget. All three said they believed the budget was in good shape, although Graham said she had not yet seen it. Instead, she said she spoke previously with city Finance Director Shirley Hughes about it.

Graham also said that Interstate 11 would have a positive effect on Boulder City, and local business owners would be fine if they continued to market themselves.

Leavitt said the interstate could bring positive and negative change. She said the downtown district would remain a “resort destination” after the bypass was built, although she worried about the businesses located off of Nevada Highway.

Shuman said the city will be affected by the way it markets itself once the interstate is finished.

“I really think it’s what we make of it. It’s been referred to as the biggest project in Boulder City since the Hoover Dam. It’s a big deal,” he said. “I like to look at it as a way to reinvent ourselves.”

When it came to the subject of naturally occurring asbestos, the candidates said they felt reassured that all entities involved were taking the proper procedures to ensure the safety of all Southern Nevadans.

“We shouldn’t be fearful of this,” Shuman said. “I picture it as a fluid situation that will change. It will constantly be monitored, different mitigation efforts will come into place. Our highest priority as a City Council is to keep our people safe. I’m not fearful, but I’m vigilant.”

“I think we’re pretty safe,” Graham said.

One of the few questions they disagreed on was the possibility of raising council pay. Graham said she was against it, Shuman said he was for it and it’s a matter that should be evaluated every four years. Leavitt said a pay raise would be appropriate but wouldn’t go into details or say how she will vote so she didn’t violate the open meeting laws.

All three candidates said they were in favor of maintaining a limited growth in Boulder City, although Leavitt said there would be more housing and commercial growth over the next 10 years.

Linda Barnett, a Boulder City resident since 2005, said the event allowed her to get a better insight of all the candidates.

“I think this covered the issues, but I just wanted to see the power behind each individual personality,” she said. “I really got a feel of the authority they had inside.”

Michael Giroux has lived in town since 1985. He said having a debate was an important part of the political process.

“How else are we going to vet candidates?” he said. “We’re low key. We’re not going to have any flamboyant politicians. We’re not a cabal, it’s just people willing to serve, and we all share the vision of what we want this town to be.”

Early voting runs until Saturday at City Hall. The general election is June 2.

Contact reporter Steven Slivka at sslivka@bouldercityreview.com or 702-586-9401. Follow him on Twitter @StevenSlivka.

MOST READ
LISTEN TO THE TOP FIVE HERE
THE LATEST
City awards $1.6M for pool design

Back in March 2024, Councilwoman Sherri Jorgensen said, “I can’t even imagine what it would cost in 2028.”

City transfers bond capacity

Kevin Hickey, of the Nevada Rural Housing Authority, has been making pretty much the same presentation to the council annually thanking the city for transferring nearly $1 million in bond capacity to the group he represents.

Council confusion: The leash law saga continues

Three statements — notably, none of them from members of the city council — best illustrated the difficulties residents (both dog-loving and not) have had for at least four years when it comes to the issue of off-leash dogs in public parks.

Breeding in BC? Probably not

Unlike the discussion later in the meeting Tuesday night in which the city council appeared determined to make sure no one was angry at them about the issue of off-leash dogs, they directed staff to take very strong action on the issue of pet breeding.

Huge crowd turns out to honor Patton

It was brought up during Saturday’s unveiling of the Shane Patton Memorial Monument as to why Shane’s statue stands 11 feet tall.

City Celebrates First Responders

Photos courtesy City of Boulder City

Toll Brothers gets split decision

The development of the area near Boulder Creek Golf Course known as Tract 350 (the sale of which is slated to pay for the majority of the planned replacement for the aging municipal pool) may have hit a snag last week as the planning commission voted 5-1 to deny the developers’ request to build houses closer to the street than is allowed under current law.

Council gives nod to 185 new hangars

There is at least one part of Boulder City that is set to see growth in the coming years. A lot of growth.