81°F
weather icon Clear

Candidates make final push

The three candidates running for City Council made one final push for votes as they shared their thoughts about several issues Tuesday evening inside the Elaine K. Smith Center.

About 50 people watched and listened as Rich Shuman, Peggy Leavitt and Linda Graham gave their input on myriad subjects, including Interstate 11, naturally occurring asbestos, the growth of Boulder City, and this year’s ballot question among others.

About half of the questions were submitted ahead of time so candidates could do research before the event, while the rest were asked on the fly. The event was sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce.

There was not much dissent among the candidates as all three shared opinions on a majority of the issues. All were in favor of ballot question No. 1, which asks the voters if the city can spend up to $1 million per year indefinitely from the capital improvement fund to repair city facilities.

Leavitt equated the capital improvement fund to making repairs on your home.

“I think it’s important for the voters to know that the capital improvement fund, by definition, can be used only for capital improvements,” she said.

Rich Shuman echoed the sentiment.

“The electrical system and the water system have been deteriorating over time. Over the last six years or so, we haven’t had the funds to make those necessary repairs,” he said.

Candidates also were asked about the city’s budget. All three said they believed the budget was in good shape, although Graham said she had not yet seen it. Instead, she said she spoke previously with city Finance Director Shirley Hughes about it.

Graham also said that Interstate 11 would have a positive effect on Boulder City, and local business owners would be fine if they continued to market themselves.

Leavitt said the interstate could bring positive and negative change. She said the downtown district would remain a “resort destination” after the bypass was built, although she worried about the businesses located off of Nevada Highway.

Shuman said the city will be affected by the way it markets itself once the interstate is finished.

“I really think it’s what we make of it. It’s been referred to as the biggest project in Boulder City since the Hoover Dam. It’s a big deal,” he said. “I like to look at it as a way to reinvent ourselves.”

When it came to the subject of naturally occurring asbestos, the candidates said they felt reassured that all entities involved were taking the proper procedures to ensure the safety of all Southern Nevadans.

“We shouldn’t be fearful of this,” Shuman said. “I picture it as a fluid situation that will change. It will constantly be monitored, different mitigation efforts will come into place. Our highest priority as a City Council is to keep our people safe. I’m not fearful, but I’m vigilant.”

“I think we’re pretty safe,” Graham said.

One of the few questions they disagreed on was the possibility of raising council pay. Graham said she was against it, Shuman said he was for it and it’s a matter that should be evaluated every four years. Leavitt said a pay raise would be appropriate but wouldn’t go into details or say how she will vote so she didn’t violate the open meeting laws.

All three candidates said they were in favor of maintaining a limited growth in Boulder City, although Leavitt said there would be more housing and commercial growth over the next 10 years.

Linda Barnett, a Boulder City resident since 2005, said the event allowed her to get a better insight of all the candidates.

“I think this covered the issues, but I just wanted to see the power behind each individual personality,” she said. “I really got a feel of the authority they had inside.”

Michael Giroux has lived in town since 1985. He said having a debate was an important part of the political process.

“How else are we going to vet candidates?” he said. “We’re low key. We’re not going to have any flamboyant politicians. We’re not a cabal, it’s just people willing to serve, and we all share the vision of what we want this town to be.”

Early voting runs until Saturday at City Hall. The general election is June 2.

Contact reporter Steven Slivka at sslivka@bouldercityreview.com or 702-586-9401. Follow him on Twitter @StevenSlivka.

MOST READ
LISTEN TO THE TOP FIVE HERE
THE LATEST
Really better buy that helmet

With a couple of significant amendments, the city council voted unanimously to pass an ordinance regulating the use of e-bikes and e-scooters in Boulder City. The ordinance passed unanimously Tuesday and will take effect on Sept. 18.

Nevada Way to go Pink … and pay for the privilege

The main topic of discussion was color. As in color of a building when the board of the Boulder City Redevelopment Agency (aka the city council) met two weeks ago.

City to nix admin services dept. in favor of deputy city manager

In a move that is really little more than “cleanup” (i.e., bringing official city code into sync with decisions made by the city council more than a year ago), the council voted to approve changes to city code related to the created-but-not-yet-filled position of deputy city manager.

Better buy a helmet …

It was just the opening salvo, but it appears that lost patience with riders of e-bikes and scooters are to the point that they are ready to go well beyond the “Well, how about more education” approach they opted for back in April.

Boulder City approves fire captains’ 2-year contract

For those who may have seen any of the recent social media posts put out by reps of the firefighters union calling out the city about pay and benefits, they might have been surprised that one collective bargaining agreement covering fire department personnel was approved by the city council this week without any discussion at all.

What’s on the pole?

There are 1,450 power poles in Boulder City and 880 of them support equipment owned by private companies who don’t pay for the privilege.

Shooting gets another look

It’s a case that captured the attention of many in Boulder City more than four years ago and has kept that attention ever since.

Advocate for preservation?

It is not often in Boulder City that there is resident pressure for the city to create a new position and hire someone to fill it. But that is the situation discussed recently by the Historic Preservation Commission.