99°F
weather icon Clear

Ethics complaint against mayor dismissed

The Nevada Commission on Ethics recently dismissed a complaint accusing Mayor Kiernan McManus of abusing his position as a public officer because of a “lack of sufficient credible evidence of a violation.”

On March 17, a review panel wrote that the “evidence does not support a factual basis … to demonstrate that McManus used his position as mayor to improperly influence a subordinate,” as claimed in an ethics complaint submitted by former Mayor Roger Tobler and former City Council members Peggy Leavitt, Duncan McCoy and Mike Pacini.

“The decision of the State Ethics Commission is yet another rejection of the deliberate smear campaign that former councilmembers and appointed officials have been waging against me,” McManus wrote in an email to the Boulder City Review. “The allegations made were again found to be baseless and without merit. When I was elected, I promised to have city government work for all of our residents and not a select few. I intend to keep that promise … .”

According to the complaint, McManus bypassed then City Manager Al Noyola and sent a memo to Finance Director Diane Pelletier on Sept. 15 requesting $36,906 in charges be paid to the Bailey Kennedy law firm including $14,400 from before the firm was officially hired by the city. They said by that action he used his position as a public officer to receive legal counsel paid for by the city in a nonofficial capacity.

Leavitt said she was disappointed with the review panel’s decision.

“They did not determine that no ethics violation existed only that there was insufficient evidence to allow them to move forward and render an opinion,” she said. “They let him off on technicalities, such as the fact that he wasn’t sued personally until two weeks after voting to retain Bailey Kennedy as the city’s attorney. Mayor McManus still spent $14,400 in taxpayers’ dollars before that firm was ever retained. … But, regardless, letting somebody off on technicalities doesn’t mean that they didn’t act unethically.”

According to the complaint, McManus also bypassed the city manager’s authority with administrative matters.

“He can’t do that unless it’s through the city manager,” said Tobler. “I’ve been mayor before. I know how it works. You have to follow the rules. … There was a memo. He definitely sent it. It was supposed to go through the city manager.”

According to Boulder City’s charter, City Council “shall deal with the administrative service solely through the City Manager, and neither the Council nor any member thereof shall give orders to subordinates of the City Manager, either publicly or privately.”

The group claims by sending his memo to Pelletier instead of Noyola, who was still employed by the city at the time, McManus violated NRS 281A.400(9) that prohibits him as a public officer from “attempt(ing) to benefit a significant personal or pecuniary interest” of his own “through the influence of any subordinate.”

“After all, the mayor not only has a significant personal interest in the outcome of the litigation in terms of its potential impact on his reputation, presumed competence and character, and political career, but also a significant pecuniary interest since he has been sued individually for attorney’s fees, compensatory damages, and possibly even punitive damages,” they wrote.

Tobler said that as mayor McManus should not change the process outlined in the charter or break the law.

“At the end of the day, I want the city to be successful,” he said.

“I thought there was a problem with a series of those transactions but apparently the commission didn’t think there was enough to worry about,” added McCoy about the determination.

Since this complaint was dismissed, no more proceedings will be held. All the allegations of state law violations are also dismissed.

Memo to Finance Director by Boulder City Review on Scribd

Ethics Complaint FINAL by Boulder City Review on Scribd

Panel Determination by Boulder City Review on Scribd

Contact reporter Celia Shortt Goodyear at cgoodyear@bouldercityreview.com or at 702-586-9401. Follow her on Twitter @csgoodyear.

MOST READ
LISTEN TO THE TOP FIVE HERE
THE LATEST
City not moving forward with motel district

It appears that everyone is on the same page in that they want to see motels in Boulder City retain their historic charm.

BC family creates hydration supplement for kids

Like many parents of school-aged children, Boulder City’s Alex and Anabel Smith often find their weekends filled with youth activities and sports.

City proposes utility rate hike

Last week, the city of Boulder City announced a proposal to raise utility rates by 15% over the next three years.

Celebrating America with love

The USA is the longest standing democratic republic in the history of the world. Much history has passed since the country declared its independence from Great Britain, hasn’t it? Even the king of England celebrated our independence by visiting the United States of America in April of this year.

Local duo competes in high school rodeo finals

Representing Boulder City in the high school rodeo scene, Aiden Brown and Alyvia Madsen competed in the National High School Finals Rodeo (NHSFR) in Lincoln, Neb. from July 19-25.

Ho(t), ho(t), ho(t)

It was Christmas in July Saturday as those seeking a little holiday cheer filled the basement of the Masonic Temple. The Boulder City Community Club and the Boulder City History and Arts Foundation co-hosted the event, which included a visit from Santa and the Grinch and Christmas music by Patrick Mahoney and Maire Egan on fiddle. More than a dozen gift baskets were donated by local residents and merchants as raffle prizes, while the food was also free thanks to donations. Proceeds were split between to the two hosting organizations.

City proposes utility rate hike

Thursday afternoon, the city of Boulder City posted on its official Facebook page a legal notice announcing a proposal to raise utility rates by 15% over the next three years.

Loophole lets data center evade public’s scrutiny

The unusual Bureau of Land Management approval has turned a controversial data center fight in Southern Nevada on its head. Here’s what happens next.